4 Things the CEO of Impossible Foods Got Wrong About GMO Soy

By Mike Adams

As the Impossible Burger begins appearing on more and more menus around the U.S., the company behind it, Impossible Foods, has had to make a major change to keep up: the addition of GMO soy. To add insult to injury, the company’s CEO, Pat Brown, is trying to convince people this is somehow a positive change that can help to save the planet.

Brown has claimed that GMO soy is actually “the safest and most environmentally responsible option” as his company prepares to churn out mass quantities of their fake meat burger that can stand up to the flame grilling process at Burger King, among other places. Let’s not forget that this “burger” already uses a genetically engineered yeast known as heme to make its burgers appear to bleed like real meat.

Experts and consumers alike are taking him and his firm to task for this outlandish statement. Here’s a look at four things he got wrong about GMO soy, according to the Organic Consumers Association.

  • It uses more pesticides
  • It damages biodiversity
  • It’s not nearly as healthy as they claim
  • Its safety has not been proven

Learn more:https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-11-20-4-things-impossible-foods-got-wrong-gmo-soy.html

Fake News About Flu Shots

WSJ Article on Flu Shots: Perfect Example of Fake News!

By David Brownstein, M.D.

The WSJ article starts by stating, “Each year, influenza sickens millions of people. But typically, too few Americans get the flu shot to shield everyone from the contagious disease.”

The article then states that babies and those who cannot be vaccinated are put at risk when people decide to forgo the flu vaccine.

True News: Yes, millions do get the flu each year.

Fake News: The flu shot has NEVER BEEN SHOWN to prevent transmission of the flu. The best it can do is to limit the symptoms in an infected person. That person can still transmit the flu virus to others.

The flu vaccine is not the only vaccine that fails to stop the spread of disease. Diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio (injectable) and the meningitis vaccines all fail to prevent the spread of the respective illnesses, but that’s another article.

To claim the flu shot will protect the spread of influenza to those with immune systems that are vulnerable is…FAKE NEWS!

The article states, “…there are life-threatening conditions that the {influenza virus} can trigger, including inflammation of the heart, brain or spinal cord. A nursing expert stated, “It’s really the complications related to the flu that we should be scared about. That’s what the vaccine helps to prevent or reduce.”

True News: Influenza can cause serious complications including those mentioned above. The greatest risk of complications from the flu do occur in children and the elderly.

Fake News: The flu shot has NEVER BEEN SHOWN TO REDUCE SERIOUS COMPLICATIONS SUCH AS PNEUMONIA OR HOSPTILIZATION FROM INFLUENZA INFECTION IN CHILDREN, HEALTHY ADULTS AND THE ELDERLY!

Cochrane is an independent group of scientists who evaluate evidence from research. They do not take funding from Big Pharm and other commercial interests and therefore their reviews should be carefully weighed.

A 2018 Cochrane Review on Vaccines for Preventing Influenza in Healthy Children (1) reported that there was “…no data on…hospitalisation{sic}.” The authors further reported limited evidence for the treatment of lower respiratory tract disease (i.e., pneumonia). The Cochrane authors further state, “To date no studies have adequately measured or reported hospitalisation (sic) {benefits of the influenza vaccine}.”

Another Cochrane review on influenza vaccines in healthy adults found flu shots “…had no effect on hospital admissions or complication rates.” (2)

In the elderly, a third Cochrane Review (3) found that there was inadequate data available to assess whether flu shots decrease this risk of pneumonia or hospitalization in the elderly.

Since the flu shot, at best, provides a one percent benefit for the elderly at preventing the flu, I can assure you that there will never be data that shows the flu vaccine prevents serious complications from influenza infection in this population.

It is FAKE NEWS to state that the flu shot significantly lowers ones risk for serious complications from the flu.

The author of the article wrote, “At greatest risk of senior citizens. People age 65 and older accounted for 86% of flu-related death and 69% of hospitalizations in the 2017-2018 flu season. Altogether, an estimated 960,000 people were hospitalized that season and more than 79,000 died.”

True News: The elderly are at greatest risk of influenza.

Fake News: As stated above, the flu vaccine has NEVER been shown to protect those aged 65 and older. And, 79,000 dying from the flu last year?

No way.   The CDC annually gins up the number of deaths from the flu by reporting pneumonia and flu deaths as one number. Then, the CDC reports this number as the total dying from the flu.

However, the yearly number who actually die from the flu are tens of thousands lower than who die from influenza.

I have written about this shifty practice many times–see this blog post for more information: https://www.drbrownstein.com/the-truth-about-the-flu-vaccine/.

The number who die from the flu range from a few hundred to a few thousand per year. Since the flu vaccine does not prevent pneumonia, and pneumonia deaths vastly outnumber flu deaths sometimes 20-40x, there is simply no reason to lump the numbers together unless you want to unnecessarily scare the population into getting a flu vaccine. To further confuse us, the CDC has recently stopped reporting the breakdown between who actually died from the flu and who died from [pneumonia].

I have only covered about one-third of the WSJ article. But, that is enough. The WSJ should research better before reporting Big Pharma talking points.

The flu shot is not without adverse effects. Many flu shots contain mercury which is the second most toxic substance known to mankind. Mercury should never be injected into any living being. There are other toxins in the flu vaccine.

The flu vaccine is the most common vaccine compensated by the Federal Government for adverse effects.   I could write a lengthy article about the adverse effects from the flu vaccine, but that is for another time.

Should you get a flu shot? Hopefully you now have the information available to you in order to make an informed decision.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2019/dr-brownstein-exposes-fake-news-about-flu-shot-in-wsj/

Did Google Conspire to Commit Treason?

Why the World Needs a Google Detox

By Dr. Joseph Mercola

Google whistleblower Zach Vorhies has released 950 pages of Google documents that paint a comprehensive picture of how Google is manipulating public opinion and the political landscape.

Changes at Google first became noticeable in 2016, after Donald Trump was elected president of the United States. Vorhies later discovered evidence suggesting Google was playing a role in the effort to remove President Trump from office.

Machine Learning Fairness is a Google project that replaces “unfair” search results — even when the “unfairness” is accurately reflecting worldly reality — with more “fair and balanced” search results, thereby artificially altering what people perceive as “reality”.

Google tools such as autofill search recommendations can be used to sway public opinion on political (and other topics), which can have significant political consequences.

Research shows biased search rankings can shift voting preferences of undecided voters by 20% or more, and that people will be completely unaware of having been manipulated.

Learn more: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2019/11/17/google-detox.aspx?utm

Bombshell: Hundreds of Cancer Genes in MMR Vaccines

By Ethan Huff

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published the results of an eye-opening investigation which found that the cellular matter used in the manufacture of many childhood vaccines is often contaminated with serious disease-causing viruses.

Conducted by Arifa S. Khan, PhD, the study looked at viral-based vaccines like seasonal flu shots that are made from living cells, or replicable cell substrates. As it turns out, these continual growth cells are oftentimes contaminated with hidden viral fragments that are tumorigenic in nature, meaning they have the potential to cause cancer.

These viruses tend to be latent, meaning they live “quietly” inside cells before eventually making their presence known later on down the road in the form of chronic disease. Thus, a person injected with a vaccine containing these cancer-causing viruses may not suffer the health consequences until long after he or she was jabbed – we’re talking many, many years, in some cases.

“In some cases the cell lines that are used might be tumorigenic, that is, they form tumors when injected into rodents,” the FDA paper clearly explains.

“Some of these tumor-forming cell lines may contain cancer-causing viruses that are not actively reproducing. Such viruses are hard to detect using standard methods. These latent, or ‘quiet,’ viruses pose a potential threat, since they might become active under vaccine manufacturing conditions.”

Even as the medical establishment continues to insist that all vaccines are “safe and effective,” these findings reiterate the fact that vaccinology, at least as we currently know it, is a total hoax. There isn’t a single jab out there that’s been properly safety tested against a true inert placebo, and now we know that many of them are also contaminated with disease-causing viruses.

dddhttps://www.naturalnews.com/2019-11-13-fda-admits-vaccines-may-spread-more-disease.html

CDC Paid Millions to Promote Gardasil Vaccine as Requirement for School Attendance

By Josh Mazer

The Maryland Prevention and Health Promotion Agency (PHPA) has received millions — $123 million just between 2012–2017 — as part of an effort to require public schools to force children to get the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination. Those funds came in the form of grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC maintains a nonprofit foundation that gets enormous amounts of money from Big Pharma — including Merck, the company that produces Gardasil, the HPV vaccine.

Learn more:https://healthimpactnews.com/2019/cdc-paid-maryland-123-million-to-promote-gardasil-vaccine-as-requirement-for-school-attendance/

WiFi, 5G and EMF pollution = PSYCHIATRIC effects, Spontaneous Abortions, Infertility and Cellular DNA DAMAGE

By Ethan Huff

Are you aware of just how much electromagnetic pollution is impacting your body on a daily basis?

The problem isn’t just wireless internet, by the way: it’s also fifth-generation mobile telecommunication technology, also known as 5G, as well as every other source of electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs) that exists all around us.

A review published in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Research draws attention to the many threats of WiFi in terms of human health – and they’re pretty serious.

In addition to spurring the death of healthy cells and damaging human DNA, WiFi signals can lead to psychiatric damage in those who are persistently exposed to them – think depression, difficulty thinking clearly, mood swings, and other behavioral abnormalities.

Neuropsychiatric damage is a common adverse effect of wireless exposure, and it could explain why many people in the modern age suffer from chemical imbalances in the brain that negatively impact their ability to function consistently.

One of the studies included in this review suggests that WiFi exposure during pregnancy could cause impaired neurodevelopment in unborn babies. WiFi is also associated with increased cholinesterase and changes in GABA and cholinergic transmission, decreased special learning, and a “greatly lowered” ability to “distinguish familiar from novel objects.”

Spontaneous abortion is another common effect of wireless exposure that stems from chromosomal mutations. Besides lowering fertility in both males and females, wireless signals cause oxidative stress that, in pregnant woman, can cause them not to have healthy deliveries.

Learn more: https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-11-08-wifi-5g-emf-cause-psychiatric-and-physical-damage.html

MASSIVE RECALL: More Than 100 Vegetable Products Recalled Across US and Canada (Many Organic!)

By Daisy Luther

This recall is a beast of epic proportions. You may have thought the recent apple recall was crazy but wait until you see the massive scope of this one.

More than one hundred vegetable products have been recalled by Mann Packing Company because they may be contaminated with listeria. The massive recall spreads across the United States and Canada. It contains both store brand and private label brands, some of which are organic.

Learn more: https://www.naturalblaze.com/2019/11/massive-recall-more-than-100-vegetable-products-recalled-across-us-and-canada-many-organic.html?

What if Everything You’ve Been Told About Cancer is a Lie?

87 Doctors, Scientists & Survivors From 7 Countries in Asia UNITE to End CANCER!

In the summer of 2018, the TTAC team took a voyage across 7 countries in Asia – Japan, Taiwan, Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and India.

On their journey, they discovered amazing cancer treatment protocols, many of which have been “hidden” from the rest of the world. The trip was insightful, the information was invaluable, and the people they met along the way were remarkable.

Watch all 7 episodes FREE: https://go.thetruthaboutcancer.com/eastern-medicine/?a_bid=826cac6b&chan=trailer&a_aid=56c35dbdbf906&utm

Gene-Editing Unintentionally Adds Bovine DNA, Goat DNA, and Bacterial DNA

By Jonathan Latham, PhD

The gene-editing of DNA inside living cells is considered by many to be the preeminent technological breakthrough of the new millennium. Researchers in medicine and agriculture have rapidly adopted it as a technique for discovering cell and organism functions. But its commercial prospects are much more complicated.

Gene-editing has many potential uses. These include altering cells to treat human disease, altering crops and livestock for breeding and agriculture. Furthermore, in a move that has been widely criticised, Chinese researcher He Jiankui claims to have edited human babies to resist HIV by altering a gene called CCR5.

For most commercial applications gene-editing’s appeal is simplicity and precision: it alters genomes at precise sites and without inserting foreign DNA. This why, in popular articles, gene-editing is often referred to as ‘tweaking’.

The tweaking narrative, however, is an assumption and not an established fact. And it recently suffered a large dent.

Learn more: https://www.greenmedinfo.health/blog/gene-editing-unintentionally-adds-bovine-dna-goat-dna-and-bacterial-dna-mouse-res?