Living With Electrohypersensitivity – A Survival Guide

gwen tower

                                    What is Electrohypersensitivity or EHS?

In addition to numerous other health problems, electromagnetic pollution has been associated with an increase in the number of individuals suffering from a condition known as electrohypersensitivity (EHS). EHS is defined by the World Health Organization as: “…a phenomenon where individuals experience adverse health effects while in the vicinity of devices emanating electric, magnetic, or electromagnetic fields.”

Human beings are bioelectrical systems. Our hearts and brains are regulated by internal bioelectrical signals. Environmental exposures to artificial EMFs can interact with fundamental biological processes in the human body.

We are living in an increasingly complex electrical environment and are inundated daily with electromagnetic frequencies ranging from less than 20 Hz (electric trains) to greater than 1 billion Hz (wireless telecommunication). Most of these frequencies are man-made and were not present until the invention and subsequent commercialization of electricity (early 1900s), radio (1920s), radar (1940s), television (1950s), computers (1970s), and cell phones (1980s). Whether, and at what intensities, these frequencies have biological effects has been a subject of scientific debate for decades.
Early recognition, avoidance of symptom-triggering agents, environmental control, treatments that may reduce residual toxins and recovery of normal biological processes are key to regaining health for people with sensitivities. Without mitigation of the incitant, people with environmental sensitivities may become severely debilitated.
Please read the entire informative article here:

Foods Gene-edited to Withstand Noxious Herbicides Are Being Labeled Non-GMO

GMO-DNA-Genes-Plate-SilverwareThe US Department of Agriculture (USDA) recently announced that it will not regulate the entire forthcoming generation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), allowing new genetically engineered (GE) foods to enter the food supply without any testing or permitting process. This “free pass” by the USDA will also allow these new GMOs to be legally marketed as “non-GMO,” including in states such as Vermont that have passed GMO labeling laws.

The technologies in question are part of a suite of techniques known (inaccurately) as “gene editing.” And foods made with “gene edited” ingredients are already being sold to consumers.

Calling it ‘non-GMO’ doesn’t make it true

Gene editing consists of using enzymes to splice out a strand of DNA at a targeted location, combined with another technique (such as insertion of a “DNA template”) to guide the DNA’s natural repair process to insert a preferred gene.

Gene editing techniques include clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR), zinc finger nucleases (ZFN), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and oligonucleotide directed mutagenesis (ODM). The latter technique consists of injecting synthetic DNA into cells, thereby triggering cells to mutate and mimic the synthetic DNA.

What none of these techniques involves is the old method of physically inserting a strand of DNA from a separate species. Thus, organisms produced by gene editing could not be accurately called “transgenic.” Yet, to deny that they are genetically modified flies in the face of both the plain and scientific meanings of the terms GE and GMO – and, notably, even the legal definitions of the European Union.

Nevertheless, the USDA recently announced that a new slow-browning variety of mushroom, produced via CRISPR, would not be regulated as a GMO, and could be sold to consumers without further testing or approval.

The implications of this are far-reaching, and not just because of the ongoing battle over whether a voluntary federal labeling standard will preempt laws in states such as Vermont. Almost 17 percent of the new food products sold in the United States in 2015 were labeled non-GMO, compared with only 3 percent just four years prior. And, according to a recent survey by market research firm Mintel, 52 percent of U.S. consumers seek out non-GMO products.

Canada has announced that foods made with “gene editing” will be regulated as “novel” products, just like transgenic GMOs. The European Union is still considering the question.

Products already at a store near you

Gene edited foods are already big business. A new herbicide-resistant canola variety engineered with gene editing is already making its way into oil sold to consumers. A soybean variety engineered to produce oil that can withstand higher heat is due to hit the market as early as 2018. Other “edited” GMOs in the works include a low-gluten wheat variety, and a potato that produces lower levels of acrylamide, a chemical linked with cancer (but found mostly in cigarettes and the breakdown products of industrial chemicals, including Roundup). Every major biotech company is investing heavily in gene editing research.

These companies are also investing in a propaganda blitz designed to convince regulators and consumers that gene editing is fundamentally different from “genetic engineering” – that it is safer, more precise and more accurate. All of these assertions are myths, says geneticist and virologist Jonathan Latham, executive director of the Bioscience Resource Project and editor of Independent Science News.

Doug Gurian-Sherman, director of sustainable agriculture at the Center for Food Safety, agrees. He says that the claims made about gene editing – namely, that it will solve problems such as disease and hunger – mirror the same false promises made about GMOs in the 1990s.

“This is largely unproven,” he said. “There’s a proclivity to believe we can develop new, useful technology that will answer tough problems.”

http://www.naturalnews.com/054719_gene_editing_GMOs_unlabeled_foods.html#ixzz4FN53HZRZ

Malta Fearlessly Prepares to Outlaw Glyphosate

Glyphosate-Red-Mask-HerbicideLeading by example, Malta is poised to become the first European Union nation to enact a complete ban on the carcinogenic herbicide glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller.

The move towards a complete ban in the country comes on the heels of the decision in June by the European Commission to grant an 18-month extension of the license for glyphosate.

In a meeting of member states in June, Malta was the only country that voted against the extension of the license. The Maltese government has now begun taking steps towards implementing a complete ban on glyphosate use, according to the Times of Malta.

Malta’s decision to impose an outright ban – after an earlier “disappointing compromise” vote in April by five of the country’s six MEPs to approve a seven-year extension of the license – was at least partly based on revelations regarding an alleged conflict of interest on the part of the chairman of the UN’s Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR).

Fraud, corruption and conflict of interest

In May, The Guardian published an article revealing the conflict of interest charges:

“It has emerged that an institute co-run by the chairman of the UN’s joint meeting on pesticide residues (JMPR) received a six-figure donation from Monsanto, which uses the substance as a core ingredient in its bestselling Roundup weedkiller.

“Professor Alan Boobis, who chaired the UN’s joint FAO/WHO meeting on glyphosate, also works as the vice-president of the International Life Science Institute (ILSI) Europe.”

In 2012, the ILSI accepted a $500,000 donation from Monsanto, according to documents which were released to the U.S. Right to Know campaign.

The organization has been tied to conflict of interest cases in the past, and is considered by many to be nothing more than an industry mouthpiece.

As it has done for years in the United States, Monsanto is also spending millions in Europe buying scientists in efforts to protect its multi-billion dollar glyphosate market.

In recent years, however, Monsanto has faced an increasingly uphill battle, as awareness of glyphosate’s dangers and opposition to its use have grown among citizens and governments, particularly in the European Union.

Increasing evidence of fraud and corruption on the part of Monsanto and its paid minions have begun to erode the biotech giant’s influence on policy-making in Europe.

When the license extension vote was cast in June, Malta was the only country opposed to the extension, but France, along with several other nations, abstained from the vote, meaning that a limited majority decision could not be reached.

Since then, France has changed its stance and opposed the extension; France is now reportedly considering its own national ban.

Setting an example for Europe to follow

Malta’s decision to ban glyphosate has been hailed as a courageous move, and may serve as an example for other countries to follow.

A spokesman for Friends of the Earth Malta said:
“The decision shows courage from government’s side as it chose to listen to the concerns of experts and individuals who have demanded that our fields, streets and gardens would be free from this risky weed killer.

“We also hope that other European countries grab this opportunity to make European farming safer and greener, which is what the public wants.”

The tide may be beginning to turn in the fight against glyphosate use and GM agriculture, but much remains to be done, particularly in the United States, where glyphosate is being used on a massive scale, while the EPA continues to raise the maximum allowable glyphosate levels.

http://www.naturalnews.com/054705_Malta_glyphosate_ban_herbicide.html#ixzz4FN38TG6E

Dozens of Teenage Girls From Japan Injured by HPV Vaccine

Vaccine-Syringe-Hand-Medical-HPVDozens of teenage girls from Japan injured by HPV vaccine file suit against government, drug makers; complaints of constant full-body pain.

News broke earlier this week that at least 64 women experiencing adverse health effects from cervical cancer vaccines, are filing damages lawsuits against the Japanese government and the drug makers who produced the vaccines in the first place.

Filing in four different district courts, the Tokyo District Court, the Nagoya District Court, the Osaka District Court and the Fukuoka District Court, each victim is demanding 15 million yen.

The average age of the women involved is 18 years old, with each receiving the vaccination between the ages of 11 and 16.

Cervical cancer vaccine causes adverse health reactions

Cervical cancer vaccines have been known to cause adverse health reactions, including nerve disorders and other alarming immune reactions.

According to Japan Times, “Cervical cancer vaccines were included in routine vaccination programs in April 2013.” After hearing numerous reports of women suffering strange, harmful side effects as a result of receiving the vaccine, the Japanese government stopped recommending cervical cancer vaccines two months later.

That changed in April of this year though, when the Japan Pediatric Society and other institutes recommended the issuance of the controversial vaccines, claiming “it is clear they are effective in preventing cervical cancer,” as reported by Japan Times.

Masumi Minaguchi, one of the lawyers representing the women filing the lawsuit, elaborated on his belief that the government and drug producers are responsible for the damages his clients have experienced. Claiming that the victims’ symptoms include pain all over the body, Minaguchi told Japan Times, “We aim to clarify the responsibilities of the government and the drugmakers through the lawsuits so that the victims can live without anxiety.”

This isn’t the first time people have voiced their concerns about cervical cancer vaccines. Nevertheless, the HPV vaccine – a method of treatment to prevent the contraction of the human papillomavirus, a known cause of the development of cervical cancer – has been strongly recommended by doctors across the U.S.

Growing concern surrounding HPV vaccine in U.S.

According to CBS News, “There’s a growing concern that more parents are stopping their children from receiving the shots because of unwarranted safety concerns.”

Between 2008 and 2010, the number of parents who refused to give their children the HPV vaccine specifically because of safety concerns nearly quadrupled, from 4.5 percent to 16 percent.

“I’m not sure what has gone into that increase,” Dr. Paul Darden, a pediatrician at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center in Oklahoma City said.

Perhaps it was the 12,424 cases of adverse health reactions, resulting in 32 deaths, that were reported in June 2006, as a result of the 23 million doses that had been administered up to that date.

Whatever it is, those suffering negative side effects associated with HPV vaccinations are not happy, and are seeking retribution.

http://www.naturalnews.com/054733_vaccine_injury_HPV_Japan.html#ixzz4FN1bbZab

If You Knew What Was In Tap Water You Would Never Drink It Again

Faucet-Water-Drip(NaturalNews) Water is essential to all life on Earth. When it comes to humans, our bodies require water for virtually every biological process needed to stay alive.

Playing a crucial part in the body’s overall digestive system, water helps to flush out your kidneys and liver, and to rid your body of any previously ingested toxins.

If water is such an essential tool in the removal of harmful substances, why would we ever want to contaminate it?

Unknown to many, most tap water has been found to contain traces of a myriad of potentially harmful toxins, including antibiotics and heavy metals. According to the Global Healing Center, “There are more than 80 ‘regulated’ contaminants and more unregulated toxins, like the rocket fuel component perchlorate which are present in most tap water.”

Harmful toxins in tap water

While some toxins are more harmful than others, arsenic, fluoride and chlorine present the greatest risk of harm for humans.

An extremely toxic heavy metal, arsenic in tap water poses grave potential health concerns. Classified as a Category I carcinogen, arsenic is almost certainly a cancer causing agent. While the EPA has set standards for arsenic levels in tap water at 10 parts per billion, several U.S. states have been known to exceed those standards from time to time.

Additionally, fluoride’s presence in most, if not all tap water, presents further negative potential health effects. One of the most toxic substances known to man, fluoride is deliberately added to tap water in the United States to help prevent tooth decay.

While no significant scientific data exists to support this claim, fluoride is still widely accepted as one of the most effective ways to inhibit the growth of cavities. Proven to be more toxic than lead, some countries around the world have caught on and banned the fluoridation process of tap water.

Chlorine in tap water poses increased risk for development of tumors

Chlorine, another toxic chemical added to most tap water, poses additional potentially severe adverse health concerns. Injected into tap water to kill bacteria, chlorine triggers the creation of free radicals in the body by bonding with other compounds to form Trihalomethanes (THMs), causing serious cell damage.

According to Global Healing Center, a research study conducted on the potentially harmful effects of ingesting chlorine found that rats drinking out of chlorinated water supplies developed tumors in their livers, kidneys and intestines.

Despite incontrovertible evidence detailing the negative health risks associated with consuming harmful toxins like arsenic, fluoride and chlorine, the government continues to allow their presence in most tap water.

http://www.naturalnews.com/054732_tap_water_fluoride_arsenic.html#ixzz4FN0AtmPb

Study: Glyphosate Proves Incredibly Hazardous to Women

women2(NaturalNews) The current issue of the Toxicology journal, details the first study in glyphosate’s more than 40 years on the market, to study its effects on uterine development. In the study, a group of researchers injected newborn rats with a commercial dose of glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH), while a control group was given a saline solution.

The researchers found that the rats who were exposed to GBH showed signs of morphological changes in their uteri from exposure as early as a week after being born. The GBH group also showed altered expression of the proteins responsible for uterine organo-genetic differentiation. This is very significant, and can mean changes in the form of embryos, such as birth deformities or being born with three ears, for example. It was also shown to affect their organs.

The findings led the researchers to conclude that glyphosate exposure affects female fertility, and could even promote the development of uterine cancer. In addition, glyphosate herbicides can disrupt the endocrine function of prepubescent rats, which indicates that the chemicals are likely endocrine disruptors.

‘Safe’ dose responsible for uterine effects

The dose of glyphosate that was found to disrupt the rats’ uterine development was based on the reference dose of the substance that regulators have claimed is safe for daily consumption over the course of one’s lifetime: 2 mg per kg of body weight each day.

This study’s findings are hardly surprising to those who are familiar with the well-documented ill effects of glyphosate, but it is notable that it was carried out and published in the first place. After all, GMO chemical firms like Monsanto do their best to make sure that unbiased scientists are not able to study the dangers of their products and release their findings.

Of course, no one should be surprised when the agrochemical lobby tries to discount these findings and/or discredit the researchers. After all, that has been their modus operandi for a number of years, and they have been quite successful in getting their product to remain on the market despite its very real dangers and being labeled by the World Health Organization as a “probable carcinogen.”

The findings are significant because glyphosate-based herbicides such as Roundup are the most widely used in the world, with more than four fifths of all edible agricultural GMOs being sprayed with the substance.

While glyphosate is indeed very dangerous on its own, it is typically combined with adjuvants that have been found to be 1,000 times more toxic than glyphosate alone. Monsanto and other firms refuse to disclose the identities of the adjuvants that they use, claiming patent proprietary rights, while risking human health and even life in pursuit of the almighty dollar.

Glyphosate already known to cause birth defects

A report released by Earth Open Source in 2011, revealed that regulators have known that Roundup causes birth defects since 1980. In addition, it is common knowledge that high rates of miscarriage have been noted in women who live in areas of Argentina where Roundup Ready soy is sprayed with glyphosate.

None of us want to be exposed to harmful toxins like glyphosate, but the truth is that we are seemingly bombarded with them from every angle in modern life. One way you can neutralize the free radicals that may damage DNA is by taking astaxanthin, one of the most important nutrients there is for human health.

It can help protect against environmental stresses, UV radiation and oxidation. It comes from algae, and is all-natural. In fact, astaxanthin is what gives salmon its pink color as well as its incredible energy for swimming against strong currents. With so many dangerous substances in our environment, we need all the strength we can get to remain healthy and have a fighting chance for lifelong health.

http://www.naturalnews.com/054731_glyphosate_birth_defects_uterine_cancer.html#ixzz4FMxpOW4A

Snuck Into Your Food, but It Should Be Banned as Found Linked to Cancer

Monsanto-Glysophate-San-Francisco-889x667Once you eat food containing this, it ends up in your gut where it can decimate your beneficial bacteria and wreak havoc on your health. Research has also linked it to reproductive problems and endocrine disruption, and according to a new study, 93 percent of Americans have detectable levels of this chemical in their urine.

Read the entire article and watch the video: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2016/07/23/monsanto-glyphosate-contamination.aspx?

What is ‘Vaccine Spectrum Disorder’ and Why is it called AUTISM?

vaccines(NaturalNews) Vaccine spectrum disorder (VSD) is the disorder children get from receiving too many vaccines too close together, many of which are combinations of viruses, bacteria and toxic adjuvants. VSD is purposely misdiagnosed and renamed autism spectrum disorder so that the vaccine industry can continue with its toxic regimen that creates customers for life. The vaccine schedule is leading to a broad array of disorders and ‘spectrum’ is just a pharma buzz word to keep the public from staring right at the REAL problem, which is that we are injecting toxins into muscle tissue, including aluminum and mercury, over and over again during the first six years of a child’s life.

Vaccine Spectrum Disorder is sweeping the nation

Some babies, as soon as they enter our world, are given toxic vaccines that contain MSG and formaldehyde meant to conjure an immune response, but, instead, basically the entire nervous system of the baby goes into shock. Today, DNA is altered in labs and mixed with bacteria, live viruses, human albumin and chemicals used to embalm dead people before being injected up to 30 times into children before they reach the age of seven.

The medical industrial complex calls it a wide “spectrum” disorder so that it can be treated with drugs (more chemicals) that will never heal the child and will, most likely, create more health detriments.

The most common jabs

Measles Live Virus Vaccine: (Attenuvax) Two injections are given; one at one-year-old and another at four-years-old. Contains gelatin, sorbitol, sodium chloride, bovine cow serum, egg protein and human albumin.

Measles and Mumps Live Virus Vaccine: (M-M-Rvax) Injected into one-year-old babies. Contains gelatin, sorbitol, sodium chloride, bovine cow serum and human albumin.

Diphtheria, Tetanus and Polio Vaccine: Five injections given between the ages of two and six, plus boosters “recommended” every 10 years. Contains formaldehyde and aluminum phosphate.

DTaP, IPV, HBV and Hib: (Diphtheria, tetanus, polio, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenza type B) Given to infants two months to 12 months with boosters less than a year later. Contains formaldehyde and bovine cow serum.

Gardasil HPV: (Human Papillomavirus vaccine). Administered to children as young as nine for a rare, sexually transmitted disease. Contains a weakened form of the virus.

Flu shots: The CDC advises on the flu insert not to get more than ONE flu shot in a lifetime.

The spectrum of toxic vaccine ingredients

Thimerosal: Neurotoxic mercury that causes autism. There are 25 mcg in an average flu vaccine, even though the EPA safety limit is 5 micrograms. That’s 10 times the safety limit all at once!

Aluminum phosphate: Increases the toxicity of mercury.

Bovine cow serum: Extracted from cow skin. A cause of arthritis and lupus.

Sorbitol: A synthetic sweetener that causes gastrointestinal issues.

Gelatin: Derived from collagen in animals’ skin and bones and may contain BSE, which is Mad Cow Disease!

Sodium Chloride: Raises blood pressure.

Egg protein: May contain growth hormones, antibiotics and salmonella.

Human albumin: Blood protein from pooled human venous plasma, which can contain diseases.

Formaldehyde: Carcinogenic fluid used to embalm the dead.

MSG: Monosodium glutamate -when injected becomes a neurotoxin, causing CNS disorder and brain damage.

One in every 68 children has a form of the spectrum. Questioning the toxins in vaccines is the first order of business. Do you have VSD? Contact your local naturopathic physician. After all, there ARE doctors out there who DON’T believe in injecting toxins in order to build immunity.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/045783_autism_spectrum_disorder_vaccines_toxic_ingredients.html#ixzz4FMnQXtGM

Now You Can Detox From Vaccines

box 4-2By Major Rush  

You would have to be blind or fixated on politics to miss the increasing wave of factual information rising up all over the net about the dangers and damage vaccines are causing.

Most articles are personal knowledge of the corruption and deception being passed off as scientific facts and insider testimonials of the intentional assault on us all, especially the children. Reading the honest science that now has totally debunked the propaganda of Big Pharm, I get to the point I want to fight back and don’t know where to start. I’m sure I’m not alone on that one.

Well, I want to advise you all of a new vaccine detox product range. To me this is a positive step so we are posting a free banner on our web site.

Recover Health is offering homeopathic based detox remedy kits for the major vaccines and an order service for the unusual ones you may have gotten. They are offering support and back-up at a professional level with their reasonably priced products.

Their perspective is; if you take out the vaccine toxins, the body can do its magic to reset the immune system. If you don’t, the body fatigues endlessly fighting the toxins purposefully locked into the body’s cells by Big Pharm’s aggressive science.

These guys are employing the homeopathic science for detoxing contaminates to allow the body to return to normal. That is definitely a good idea. And, there are no false claims about fixing the effects of adverse reaction. That is a case by case issue. They are getting the toxins out first.

So this is one for the good guys. We wish them all success for having the compassion and fortitude to offer help to the victims of Big Pharm’s depopulation plan.

So please check it out at: www.recoverhealth.net and spread the word.

Ears Ringing? The Frequencies Are Amping Up! What Does This Mean?

earBy Lori Lines

Hearing ringing in your ears of late? Did you know this is a form of clairaudience? For those of you who do not know what the word clairaudient means, it is the faculty of perceiving, by hearing, what is inaudible.

What is happening in our world, as many of you are moving up the ascension ladder from a 3 dimensional reality to a 4 and 5 dimensional reality, is the light forces and the dark forces are using psychic toning to either help or to hinder our soul’s enlightenment to truth. Psychic toning is something we really want to be aware of and to pay attention to. If you have been on the spiritual path, releasing false beliefs and releasing all dark emotions that weigh you down and entering into your own light of truth, you may be noticing various tones from very high to low. Some tones are high and some are not. The ringing may last for long periods of time or they may come in shorter duration.

Those who are not spiritually awakening either may not notice this phenomena or they may notice low vibrational frequencies only.

The important thing to notice is how they make you FEEL. Noticing and acknowledging the toning is very important. Why? Because they are asking you to pay attention to your emotions, how you feel, at the time you notice the tones and their shifting frequencies. Some tones will make you feel happy and some will make you feel agitated, angry, sad (the emotions of the darkness within.)

What is happening is something is vying for your attention. Do not feel fearful about this. You have control over the tones you hear, whether you want to hear them at all. If you like them, fine. If you don’t, that’s fine too. But, if you are hearing them and you find your moods swinging too much or the tones are too strong, ask your Angels and Guides or your Higher Self, of the highest order for the highest good, to tone it down. Tell them if the tones are too loud or too intense. You will begin to notice the difference as your prayer is answered.

In my experience, higher tones tend to make me feel better. My Guidance tells me that when this is happening, I’m receiving delivery of upgrades to my frequency, light codes, and my DNA. Therefore, I accept them, with gratitude, to the Angels, Guides, and Masters.

Also see: Do You Hear Perpetual High Pitched Frequencies?

For me, when I am hearing the really high tonal frequencies, someone is saying or thinking something very positive about me. Conversely, when I hear the low tones, depending on how loud they are determines just how loud someone is talking about me. So, if someone is really angry or upset with me, in some way, I will hear it in a low tone and their essence will be made known to me. If they are really, really projecting anger toward me, the tonal frequency becomes so intense that I know I have to spiritually protect myself from psychic attack.

I’ve learned through these negative experiences of tonal frequencies that I am in control of this and that I do not need to know who is reacting negatively to me. It’s none of my business what others think. Remembering that our world is a free-will zone, I am given the advance notice to make the choice to stay in a positive frame of mind or to react negatively. When we react positively and centered in the neutrality of love, we are staying in a higher frequency (in the 4D and the 5D reality.) When our emotions react negatively, there are dark forces that feed on and harvest the negative energy of that emotion and it is spread out among us. We get to choose.

http://www.theeventchronicle.com/metaphysics/metascience/ears-ringing-frequencies-amping-mean/