Why the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade agreement is death for democracy

Nov. 5, 2013
By Gaius Publius

The TPP is complicated — at least in appearances — and the public is having a hard time bottom-lining it.TPP_map
It’s not really hard to understand though, once you see the pattern — TPP puts the ruling class (and the corporations they control) in charge of most aspects of our economic and regulatory life. It rewrites the laws of every nation that signs it, all to increase the wealth of our pathological betters. We just need more people saying that.Listen to Bill Moyersexcellent primer on what TPP is and why it spells death to democracy (literally) and breathes even more life into the predator 1% of the 1%.


Understanding Global Smart ID

4.  biometricsNov. 8, 2013

By Julie Beal for Activist Post

What is Global Smart ID?
It’s a way to prove who you are, online. It is sometimes called remote authentication.
The security industry tends to call it ‘federated ID’, or ‘single sign on’.
It’s already being used by the military, and large corporations.
It starts by signing up with an Identity Provider (IdP), who will then act as a go-between when you want to access services online, and are asked to prove your ID. From proof of age, to driving entitlements, to ‘trustworthiness’, all of it can be confirmed by your IdP.
It can be used for a number of applications with a number of form factors – more industry speak for: you can use it for all sorts of things, e.g. payments, tickets, opening doors (ie keys), accessing company records, clocking into work, logging into the smart grid, etc, with a number of gadgets and technologies (such as NFC, and biometric scanners) – there has to be a chip involved, because this contains your encrypted ID including biometrics. It’s likely this will be in a smartphone or smart card at first (though the NSTIC is currently piloting use of rings or bracelets), but eventually it would have to be sub-dermal, to avoid loss or theft.

Why don’t we hear about it in the news?

Read more:

11 Signs of a False Flag

False FlagNov. 7, 2013
Brandon Turbeville for Activist Post

Throughout history, versions of the false flag attack have been used successfully by governments in order to direct the force of the people toward whatever end the ruling class may be seeking. At times, that end may be war, or it may be the curtailing of domestic civil liberties and basic human rights. In others, it is an economic agenda.

Indeed, false flags are themselves capable of taking on a wide variety of forms – domestic or foreign, small or large, economic or political, and many other designations that can often blur into one another. Each may serve a specific purpose and each may be adjusted and tailored for that specific purpose as societal conditions require.

For instance, the chemical weapons attack which took place inside Syria in August, 2013 serve as an example of a foreign false flag designed to whip up American fervor for war, on the platform of Responsibility to Protect similar to the Gulf of Tonkin.

Domestically speaking, a large-scale false flag such as 9/11, can be used to whip up both a massive public support for war and a popular willingness to surrender civil liberties, constitutional procedure, and constitutional/human rights. Economic false flags may take the form of manufactured “government shutdowns” or “government defaults” designed to create a demand for austerity or other pro-Wall Street solutions. Lastly, smaller-scale domestic false flags such as Sandy Hook or Aurora, often involve the implementation of gun-control measures or a greater police state.

There are, of course, many different versions of false flag attacks and none fit into a tightly crafted classification beyond the generalized term “false flag.” As stated above, some false flags may indeed embrace an element of each of the different versions listed previously both in terms of methodology and purpose.

Read more:


This TRANSATLANTIC TRADE DEAL is a full-frontal assault on democracy

indexBrussels has kept quiet about a treaty that would let rapacious companies subvert our laws, rights and national sovereignty

Nov. 4, 2013

George Monbiot for The Guardian,

Remember that referendum about whether we should create a single market with the United States? You know, the one that asked whether corporations should have the power to strike down our laws? No, I don’t either. There must have been one, mustn’t there? After all that agonising over whether or not we should stay in the European Union, the government wouldn’t cede our sovereignty to some shadowy, undemocratic body without consulting us. Would it?

The purpose of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership is to remove the regulatory differences between the US and European nations. I mentioned it a couple of weeks ago. But I left out the most important issue: the remarkable ability it would grant big business to sue the living daylights out of governments which try to defend their citizens. It would allow a secretive panel of corporate lawyers to overrule the will of parliament and destroy our legal protections.Yet the defenders of our sovereignty say nothing.

Wake up, people we’re being shafted!

Read entire article:


Scientists Say New Genetically Modified Wheat Silences DNA Sequences In The Body, Can Cause Fatalities In Children

fukushimavegetables6Nov. 4, 2013

by Natasha Longo for PreventDisease.com

Australian researchers have revealed serious issues over a new kind of genetically engineered wheat that could induce major health threats for people that consume it.

With consumption, these molecules can enter the human body and potentially silence our genes, they explained. “The findings are absolutely assured. There is no doubt that these matches exist.”

Read more:


4 Steps To Detox From Fluoride and Heavy Metals

2. fluoride-455x360Oct. 29, 2013
By Marianna Pochelli for HealthyDebates.com

Your body is naturally equipped with a self-sufficient detoxification process. But too much sugar, caffeine, processed foods, fluoride, vaccines, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, cosmetics, dioxins, stress, and too little exercise can slow the body’s natural detox function to a crawl. And then your body can’t clean itself when it is put up against the increasing number of harmful and toxic substances in the environment. Enhancing detoxification pathways is the answer to preventing your body from becoming a toxic waste dump. Once this is done you will begin mobilizing and binding the metals in your body and excreting them through your urine, bile, stool, and sweat.

How do you know if you need a detox? Read more:


The Flu Vaccine Increases Your Flu Risk

vaccineOct. 8, 2013

By Blanche Levine for HealthyDebates.com

Many people understand that flu shots aren’t effective. What is less known is vaccinating against one strain of influenza can actually increase the risk of exposure to different strains.

Research in theJournal of Virologyfound that the seasonal flu vaccine can weaken a child’s immune system and increase their chances of caching influenza viruses not included in the vaccine.

A study published inScience Translational Medicinefound a surprising complication of the vaccine design. It was found to increase the risk of contracting the flu – after vaccination.

How does the flu vaccine actually harm the body? Read more:


11 Reasons Why Flu Shots Are More Dangerous Than A Flu

2.flu-shotsNov. 11, 2013

By HealthyDebates.com

The verdict is out on flu shots. Many medical experts now agree it is more important to protect yourself and your family from the flu vaccine than the flu itself.

Every year the pharmaceutical industry, medical experts and the mainstream media work hard to convince us to get vaccinated against the flu. But we’re not being told the whole story. What we don’t hear, are cases about the adverse reactions or about the toxic chemicals being injected into us.
11 Reasons Why Flu Shots Are More Dangerous Than A Flu

‘Biofarms’ to Integrate Vaccines, Pharmaceuticals into GMO ‘Biopharmaceutical’ Crops

1. biopharmaceuticalOct 8, 2012

Anthony Gucciardi for Infowars.com

The truth really is much stranger than fiction, especially when it comes to the open and admitted future plans of major biotechnology companies. One such case involves a biotech company known as ProdiGene, the officials from which actually faced jail time back in 2002 for contaminating the traditional food supply with ‘biopharmaceutical’ crops that were growing pharmaceuticals and vaccine components associated with AIDS, diabetes, and diarrhea..

Contaminating 500,000 bushels of soy with their biopharmaceutical corn that contained pharmaceutical and vaccine components associated with deadly diseases, the company was slapped with a minor $500,000 fine by the USDA (the same government organization that gives Monsanto’s crops special speed approval and ignores the company’s blatant disregard for its regulations). As it turns out, the pharmaceutical crops were actually mixed in with traditional crops and unknowing farmers had already been planted for human consumption. The USDA claims, however, that the crops were confiscated.

After receiving the fine and some press coverage on the subject, ProdiGene decided not to apologize but to expand their mission. The company, in combination with estimates by Dow AgroSciences, stated that they sought to reach $200 billion in biopharmaceutical crops within 10 years (as of 2004). Furthermore, they estimated that 10% of the corn in the United States will be biopharmaceutical in nature.

In other 1a. GM vaccineswords, it could contain hidden nano-scale vaccinations, antibiotics, anti-depressants, or any form of pharmaceutical drug. One California based company has even created a spermicidal corn to be used as a mass contraceptive.

Read entire article: