Heard of The Cancer Act introduced in 1939 forbidding the advertising of alternative cures?

cancer-389921_1280By Envirowatch Rangitikei

It does appear that not many people know anything about it, yet many thousands of people have, and will continue to suffer from it’s effects.

Basically, it is a particularly restrictive and pernicious piece of legislation which prevents people from writing or speaking about the FACT that it is indeed possible to cure cancer using alternative methods.

The Cancer Act may also be the reason why many websites and blogs are now being threatened with fines of up to £1000, simply for alerting people to the very real dangers associated with conventional treatments.

READ MORE

http://thecontrail.com/forum/topics/did-you-know-about-the-cancer-act-1939?groupUrl=cancer-treatment-options

PDF to the Act
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1939/13/pdfs/ukpga_19390013_en.pdf

THE DANGERS OF WILLFUL BLINDNESS

10444474By EnvirowatchRangitikei

… we are creating a world, an environment, that our children and grandchildren will have to live in. We can choose now whether it is toxic or healthy. At an increasing rate however, those choices are being taken from us. Nevertheless we should continue to speak out against this happening.

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men [and women] to do nothing”. (Edmund Burke)

THERE ARE MANY ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES that are now affecting everybody on planet earth, three of which are:

  • the widespread use of chemical sprays in NZ (in particular, glyphosate aka Roundup, ‘the most toxic herbicide on the planet’ says Dr Don Hubert,  a US Professor Emeritus of Plant Pathology of 55+ years experience) …
  • our increasing exposure to radiation from Electro Magnetic Frequencies (EMFs) emitted by mobile phone towers, wifi and now Smart Meters and
  • the well documented practice (unknown to many) of geoengineering, a covert practice our government (like all governments) denies is happening.

Then add other such environmental threats as the fallout from Fukushima which has never gone away. There is also the 1080 issue, the contamination (and what I call theft) of our water (sold for pennies to corporations & on sold for high profits). Looking globally, with the TPPA issue, we’ve had the ever tightening tentacles of corporate possession of all things sovereign… the selling off of our national assets, very much a corporate issue given our government IS a corporation, as also are our ever increasingly corrupt district councils. These issues all emanate from Agenda 21 and 2030.

The potential for harm by the various environmental issues are typically being downplayed by both governments and corporations while although much of the public still remain unaware of the risks, nevertheless a large body of folks are now waking up to what is happening. People often remain unaware until they personally become affected by one or more of these issues. Typically they become ill, often with one of today’s prolific autoimmune diseases, or worse, cancer, and are forced to examine the evidence. Most don’t want to know & are happy with the daily drivel we’re fed by mainstream media.

THERE IS A COST FOR REMAINING SILENT ON THESE ISSUES as this short video by TED.com explains … “Gayla Benefield was just doing her job — until she uncovered an awful secret about her hometown that meant its mortality rate was 80 times higher than anywhere else in the U.S. But when she tried to tell people about it, she learned an even more shocking truth: People didn’t want to know..In a talk that’s part history lesson, part call-to-action, Margaret Heffernan demonstrates the danger of “willful blindness” and praises ordinary people like Benefield who are willing to speak up. (Filmed at TEDxDanubia.).”

THE DANGERS OF WILLFUL BLINDNESS

Read the entire article here: https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/home-2/

Explosive Article: The Pentagon (Deep State) Bio-weapons

1-89By Dilyana Gaytandzhieva

The US Army regularly produces deadly viruses, bacteria and toxins in direct violation of the UN Convention on the prohibition of Biological Weapons. Hundreds of thousands of unwitting people are systematically exposed to dangerous pathogens and other incurable diseases.  Bio warfare scientists using diplomatic cover test man-made viruses at Pentagon bio laboratories in 25 countries across the world. These US bio-laboratories are funded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) under a    $ 2.1 billion military program– Cooperative Biological Engagement Program (CBEP), and are located in former Soviet Union countries such as Georgia and Ukraine, the Middle East, South East Asia and Africa.

Read entire article and learn more about: Top Secret Experiments, Military Experiments on biting insects, Operation Whitecoat: Infected flies tested to bite humans, Killer Insects, Anthrax Outbreak in Georgia and NATO Human Trials, Pentagon Research on Russian Anthrax & Soviet Defector produced anthrax for the Pentagon. https://www.naturalblaze.com/2018/01/bio-weapons-pentagon.html?utm

Is Your Child Smarter Or Dumber Because Of Microwave Technologies?

rsz_children_tablet-1024x614-700x420By Catherine J. Frompovich

Parents are overjoyed when their two-year-olds ‘master’ computer games and cell phones. They interpret that as “look how smart my kid is!” Well, that’s really not the take-away message parents should be coming up with. Maybe their youngsters inadvertently are becoming addicted to a tech-meme and device, which will damage them down the road, and very dramatically: dumb and cancer?

children-smartphoneAs a researcher into electromagnetic frequencies and radiofrequencies, which cell phones and any devices that receive and send data, voice, photos, etc. wirelessly use, I realize the dangers involved for all high-tech consumers, but especially for children, whose brains absorb more RF radiation than adults.

Read entire article here: https://www.naturalblaze.com/2018/01/child-smarter-dumber-microwave-technologies.html?

Google and Facebook Emerge as a Threatening Duopoly over Personal Communication.

Screen-Shot-2018-01-17-at-6.44.27-AM-678x381By G.Edward Griffin

Google and Facebook have become a duopoly, capturing 84% of digital revenue worldwide, excluding China. That adds up to 30% of all revenue on the entire planet. The companies have a strong left-collectivist bias and are weaponizing their ideology.

Learn more: https://needtoknow.news/2018/01/google-facebook-emerge-threatening-duopoly-personal-communication/

Also see: Twitter Bans Users Based on Agreements with China and Other Foreign Governments

The Hidden Biopesticide on Your Produce

Few would argue that consuming ample quantities of fruits and vegetables in the diet is a good idea, right? Fresh produce may be the only food on the planet that all diet gurus agree on, but did you know that you may be getting a chemically-applied dose of a known carcinogen every time you eat a piece of “fresh” fruit?

If you have been eating lots of produce as part of a healthy diet, it may shock you to learn that more than forty countries, including the United States, have promoted the use of a genotoxic, carcinogenic “freshness preserver,” applied to extend the shelf-life of fruits and vegetables. And despite vehement denials of any danger to the public, health concerns regarding the expanding use of this substance continue to mount.

Sold by U.S.-based company AgroFresh Solutions, Inc. under three different trade names, this patented preservation process applies a synthetic pesticide to fruit before it has ripened. The active ingredient in the pesticide, 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), retards ripening by blocking ethylene receptors in the fruit from receiving the phytohormone ethylene – the plant’s chemical cue to ripen.[1] The trade names under which this rapidly expanding practice are operating are SmartFresh™ Technology, which is applied to produce post-harvest; Harvista™, applied to apple and pear orchards; and RipeLock™, applied to bananas after picking to retard ripening. Once applied, 1-MCP can retard ripening for up to one year.[2]

Per the manufacturer, SmartFresh technology is sold as a way to “reduce fruit waste” (marketing-speak for “increase profits”) and “maintain texture, firmness, taste and appearance of fruits by warding off negative ethylene effects.” In short, applying 1-MCP allows produce distributors to keep fruits and vegetables in storage much longer after harvest, while maintaining a fresh-looking and -tasting product to sell. Heralded as a breakthrough technology, it preserves profits for growers by allowing them to sell in-demand produce varieties during off-seasons.

Why it Matters

Marketed as “non-toxic”, the manufacturer states that SmartFresh “poses no risk to humans, animals or the environment, when used as recommended.” This marketing campaign has been very effective. Perceived as being low-risk to consumers, SmartFresh is approved for use on apples, pears, persimmons, plums, cherimoyas, kiwis, tomatoes, peaches, melons, mangoes, limes, and avocados, with more uses planned.[3] It is interesting to note that a “non-toxic” substance that “poses no risk to humans” is accompanied by safe handling instructions that specify anyone involved in application of the chemical “Wear long-sleeved shirt, long pants, shoes, socks, chemical-resistant gloves and safety glasses or goggles” while handling.[4] Nothing screams “safety” like a hazmat suit! Image credit: http://agrofresh.octochemstore.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/ProTabs_Pink_Use-Recommendations.pdf

The commercial implications of preserving the saleability of a produce harvest for an entire year are so significant, use of these technologies has spread across agricultural nations like a wildfire. 1-MCP has even penetrated the organic standards of several countries, with legislation knocking on the door of organic farming in the U.S. As of this writing, it is not allowable under the United States’ National Organic Program, however in mid-2016, a change was proposed to organic standards that would allow SmartFresh to be applied to tree fruits. The outcome of this proposal has not yet been announced.

With treated fruits lasting up to three times longer than non-treated fruits, the economic incentive is obvious. Organic standards are currently the only safeguard in place
to protect consumers from unknowingly ingesting toxic herbicides and pesticides. Organic standards should also strive to represent more localized, sustainable, and environmentally conscious agricultural practices. Are the organic standards in the United States strong enough to protect the public from the aggressive lobbying being done on behalf of these economic interests?

Read the entire article here: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/hidden-biopesticide-your-produce  This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2018

Monsanto Uses Codex to Hide GMOs from Consumers

GeneticallyEngineeredFoodBy Colin Todhunter – January 9th 2018

“Dishonest” and “disgraceful” – Monsanto attempts to gain backdoor entry for GE foods

This article was originally published by The National Health Federation (NHF).

At the recent Codex meeting in Berlin, there was an attempt to define genetically engineered (GE) food ingredients as ‘biofortified’ and therefore mislead consumers. This contravened the original Codex mandate for defining biofortification. That definition is based on improving the nutritional quality of food crops through conventional plant breeding (not genetic engineering) with the aim of making the nutrients bioavailable after digestion. The attempt was thwarted thanks to various interventions, not least by the National Health Federation (NHF), a prominent health-freedom international non-governmental organization and the only health-freedom INGO represented at Codex. But the battle is far from over.

The Codex Alimentarius Commission’s Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU) convened in Berlin during early December and drafts provisions on nutritional aspects for all foods. It also develops international guidelines and standards for foods for special dietary uses that will be used to facilitate standardized world trade.

Based upon previous meetings, the initial intention of the Committee was to craft a definition for biofortification that could then be used uniformly around the World. Biofortification originally referred to increasing certain vitamin and mineral content of basic food crops by way of cross-breeding, not genetic engineering, for example by increasing the vitamin or iron content of sweet potatoes so that malnourished populations would receive better nutrition.

However, according to president of the NHF, Scott Tips, Monsanto wants to redefine the definition to include GE ‘biofortified’ foods and it has seemingly influenced Codex delegates in that direction. Tips says, “I am sure that Monsanto would be thrilled to be able to market its synthetic products under a name that began with the word ‘bio’.”

This year’s CCNFSDU meeting witnessed a lively debate about biofortification. At the 2016 CCNFSDU meeting, chairwoman Pia Noble (married to a former Bayer executive) had opined that the definition should be as broad as possible and that recombinant technology should be included. By the 2017 meeting, the proposed definition had morphed to include GE foods.

Deceptive marketing par excellence

The EU has raised a valid objection that “biofortification” would cause confusion in many European countries due to the widespread use of the word “bio” being synonymous with “organic.” Countries within the EU have been very vocal and support this position, arguing that the definition needs to be restrictive, not broad.

Including GE foods within any definition of biofortification risks consumer confusion as to whether they are purchasing organic products or something else entirely. “Monsanto seeks to cash in on the organic market with the loaded word ‘bio’,” argues Scott Tips.

At the Codex meeting in Berlin, Tips addressed the 300 delegates in the room. “Although NHF was an early supporter of biofortification, we have since come to see that the concept is in the process of being hijacked and converted from something good into something bad,” explained Tips.

He added that if Codex is to allow any method of production and any source to be part of the biofortification definition, it would be engaging in marketing deception of the worst sort.

Read entire article here: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/monsanto-uses-codex-hide-gmos-consumers  This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2018

1080 – DoC – Why Have The Criminals Not Been Charged?

assault4Further to our previous article : New Zealand Department of Conservation thugs attack senior citizens. 1080 Poison cover-up discovered.

By Fishing and Outdoors NZ

On November 30th a senior citizen that was attacked by DoC thugs appeared in the Whitianga District Court charged with assaulting these thugs.

Has our country stooped to such a level that a crime syndicate can determine who goes before the Criminal Justice system while the victims get charged with the crimes they committed.

No arrests or charges against these DoC thugs has resulted.

Steve Bowden the Operations Manager of DoC was present during the attacks. He oversaw the assaults and failed to render assistance to any of the victims.

Yet his Department are able to press charges..

Have the NZ Police been directed to ignore the truth in the matter and allow the thugs to walk free?

The Police investigation according to the OIC of the Whitianga Police is continuing.

So what has happened to the CCTV footage that must show who the guilty parties are?

Surely this footage wouldn’t have strangely gone missing?

The public of New Zealand and these victims demand justice.

Surely these thugs should feel the strong arm of the law and not be allowed to walk free or is this another bungled Police investigation?

Sgt Andrew Morrison said: “I can confirm an incident occurred at Whitianga related to the D.O.C 1080 drop on the 19/10/17.

This incident has been investigated and a decision made to put one person before the court.”

http://fishingoutdoors.org/hunting-information/hunting-articles/122-1080-articles/2946-doc-why-have-the-criminals-not-been-charged.html

Also see:

1080 Poisoning a Social Issue – Taking the Cheaper Option

1080 – Fawns left to Die of Cold and Starvation

Starship Flotillas to End UFO Cover-Up

sddefaultBy Richard Boylan, Ph.D.

Very soon the UFO Cover-Up will come to an abrupt end. How?
Star Nations will position flotillas of their starships filling the skies above five major metropolises. Those five metropolises are: Los Angeles, CA: Minneapolis, MN; Nashville, TN; Monterrey in Nuevo Leon State, Mexico; and London, UK.                                       These aerial displays will last for 24 hours.

It will hardly be humanly possible for a resident of any of these cities not to notice them. And of course many people will whip out their smart cellphone and take pictures or video of the aerial display. And email/text those photos to their friends, television news stations and networks, and Internet social media. Presto! Worldwide disclosure of Star Visitors presence!  And the end of the ludicrous UFO Cover-Up!

This Public Manifestation of Star Visitors Presence comes after decades of their quiet, dignified honorable contacts with various governments coupled with requests of government leaders to announce to their people that the Star Visitors are real, some of them are already here, and they are friendly and seek peaceful dialogue. But the governments have stood pat, kept silent, and stalled.

So finally the Star Nations have taken this initiative to end the nonsensical and childish UFO Cover-Up.

Soon enough you will see on your television scenes of Star Visitors meeting with United Nations and other leaders in public view of the cameras. Just as should have happened fifty years ago.  It is time. It is past time.

Learn More: http://drboylan.com/