Massive Vaccine Cover-Up

hpv-virus-By ANH-USA

New evidence shows that members of a global vaccine committee may have been involved in a massive cover-up regarding the safety of the HPV vaccine. State-based action alerts!

Earlier this month, Cornell-trained clinical pathologist Sin Hang Lee, MD, sent an open letter to the director general of the World Health Organization, Dr. Margaret Chan, alleging that members of the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) are guilty of gross misconduct and criminal malfeasance in their efforts to mislead the global public on the safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.

The controversy revolves around Dr. Lee’s study finding that Gardasil (Merck’s HPV vaccine) contains HPV L1 gene DNA fragments. In a separate case study, Dr. Lee found HPV-16 L1 DNA fragments in post-mortem blood samples of a teenager who died six months after receiving three Gardasil injections. Dr. Lee hypothesizes that the HPV L1 gene DNA fragments bind to aluminum adjuvants in the vaccine and are carried through the blood stream by macrophages to the brain, causing the adverse effects many experience after receiving HPV shots. Based on this evidence, Dr. Lee called for further study of the HPV vaccines.

One would think the scientific community would take heed—especially scientists on the GACVS, who are responsible for advising the world on vaccine safety. Aluminum in vaccines is a serious issue that we’ve addressed at length in previous coverage. There are studies that have linked aluminum to all kinds of negative health effects ranging from autism to Alzheimer’s disease. Other researchers have noted that, despite eighty years of use, the safety of aluminum adjuvants rests largely on assumptions rather than experimental evidence.

Emails obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request indicate that members of GACVS saw Dr. Lee as an inconvenient adversary to their pro-vaccine agenda from the start. Note that this was all taking place before a public hearing in Japan to determine whether or not the Japanese government would recommend the vaccine to its citizens. Because there were no peer-reviewed studies refuting Dr. Lee’s claims, GACVS needed to get creative to reassure the Japanese government that the HPV vaccine was totally safe and Dr. Lee’s findings could be ignored.

GACVS did this through a presentation at the hearing and an official statement afterward. However, as Dr. Lee argues in his open letter, the official statement contains numerous—and in his view, intentional—misrepresentations of peer-reviewed science that conflate the facts in an attempt to mislead the public. Dr. Lee also alleges that members of GACVS knew that the HPV vaccine, more so than other vaccines, caused an increased inflammatory response and the release of cytokines and tumor necrosis factors (TNF)—yet still assured the public that the HPV vaccine was safe. Release of TNF can causecell death and a wide range of inflammatory reactions—including death in some instances.

GACVS admits in its statement that it did not even review Dr. Lee’s work but claims it was reviewed by a “panel of experts.” No names are provided, nor are any further credentialing details about this “panel.”

Dr. Lee’s letter cites many more instances of GACVS scrambling to refute the science by misstating the facts and misleading the non-scientific public. Interested readers should consult Dr. Lee’s full letter for a more detailed account of this shameful, possibly criminal, manipulation of the facts.

This is only the latest cause for concern in regard to the HPV vaccine’s safety. You can consult our previous coverage for more of that information, especially of the former Merck doctor who said that Gardasil would become the “greatest medical scandal of all time.” There have also been as-yet-unexplained (or even acknowledged) cover-ups of other vaccine research as well, for example the decision to hide evidence that the MMR vaccine caused autism among black male infants.

Science is ever-evolving, with new evidence coming to light all of the time which throws doubt on previously held assumptions. What this scandal shows is that the proponents of the vaccine industry, who consistently and vehemently claim the mantle of “science” to defend their elimination of our freedoms, care less about the actual science than about pushing their own agenda, regardless of the evidence or the cost in human life—the very antithesis of the scientific method. Unfortunately, governments and world health organizations are now integrated into the vaccine industry in a way that can only be described as cronyism.

http://www.naturalblaze.com/2016/01/massive-vaccine-cover-up.html?

No Poison Is Good For You In Small Doses

poisonBy Luis Miranda

A not so recent practice and talk point from mainstream media and conventional medicine says that inventions such as vaccines or other products manufactured by large corporate multinationals are safe, or that they are not as dangerous for people because the doses of life-threatening chemicals in them is very low.

It is important to raise the point here that no toxic chemical has ever been proven to be safe for human use via ingestion, injection, inhalation, spray or spreading it over someone’s body.

Ingesting, inhaling, injecting or spreading toxic chemicals on someone, just because the amount of one or a number of chemicals is low is not only illogical, but also equally dangerous for those who use the products.

The danger of getting sick or dying due to exposure to toxic chemicals in food, cleaning products or those used in vaccines, for example, is magnified when the product combines several hundreds of toxic chemicals which are rarely written on labels.

Let’s take vaccines as an example. The average flu vaccine contains 25,000 times more mercury than it is legally allowed in drinking water. Yet, these vaccines are provided as ‘safe’ tools to fight disease. Many vaccine inserts alert people that the vaccines have not been tested for potential carcinogenic effects.

It is not uncommon to find hundreds of websites kept by researchers and parents of children or relatives who were severely damaged by vaccines, but very few have been able to succinctly explain why it is not a good idea to inject poisonous chemicals in a child or an adult. The best top-ten reasons not to vaccinate were recently presented by Michelle Goldstein, on Vactruth.com.

“Once vaccinated, the potential side-effects cannot be easily undone, if at all. These include death, sudden infant death syndrome, auto-immune disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, allergies, asthma, ADHD, autism, Guillian-Barré Syndrome and other neurological damage,” explains Goldstein, a mental health therapist who also works with holistic medicine.

Goldstein provides ten key reasons that all parents and adults should consider and research before deciding to vaccinate:

Vaccines have never been proven safe or effective. This alone should raise enough questions for anyone who desires to use so-called immunizations.

Vaccines do NOT work. If the first reason was not enough to make you question vaccines, this one should. As explained by many health practitioners, vaccines inhibit the body’s natural immune reaction to cope with disease on top of polluting a child’s body with often unknown amounts of dangerous chemicals.

The very first vaccine was a disaster. As many other accepted myths, vaccine effectiveness and safety come from the minds of hijacked modern medicine establishments that were taken over by organizations such as the Rockefeller, Ford and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations. By the way, these organizations are creations of the oil industry whose byproducts are found in drinking water and of course vaccines.

Vaccines are highly profitable for pharmaceutical companies and the healthcare industry. This means that, even if vaccines were effective, which they are not, profit most likely overcomes safety, which is why pandemics such as the H1N1 and Ebola usually result in billions of dollars in profits for the farmaceutical industry, which is also favored by Rockefeller, and other ‘philanthropic’  organizations.

All vaccines contain a number of toxic poisons and chemicals that are linked to serious neurological damage including aluminum, thimerosal (methyl mercury), antibiotics, monosodium glutamate (MSG) and formaldehyde. How many times have you thought about ingesting or injecting yourself or your kids with anti-freeze, lead, cadmium, glycerine or acetone? Well, those ingredients are also found in vaccines.

Every -independently conducted- study comparing unvaccinated to vaccinated children demonstrates that unvaccinated children enjoy far superior health. This is one of the points that is not understood by the pro-vaccine crowd. They want to mandate that all children and adults be vaccinated, even though unvaccinated children fair better than those whose immune systems have been tainted with vaccines.

Vaccines cause a host of “chronic, incurable, and life-threatening diseases,” including autism, asthma, ADHD, auto-immune disorders, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, food allergies and brain damage. By the way, if you don’t believe this, ask yourself why do countries create “vaccine court”? Vaccine courts are entities created by the pharmaceutical industry and government agencies to deal with lawsuits brought up by the parents of children who have been damaged by vaccines. Even though the existence of these courts is widely unknown, the truth is that they have paid millions of dollars in compensation to families who were affected by vaccine poisoning.

Scientifically speaking, the only way to create true life-long immunity to a disease is through natural exposure to the disease in which the body creates true antibodies and immunity on many levels.

Vaccines kill infants, children and adults. No matter how safe pharmaceutical companies say their products are or how their safety has been reviewed by health authorities. Any study conducted by the pharmaceutical industry which is later submitted to government health organization will ever be performed objectively. Remember that pharmaceutical companies write their own rules and conduct their own safety and effectiveness studies. What can you expect from that?

Perhaps the top reason that explains why vaccines are untrustworthy is the fact that if you or a loved one suffers from a vaccine injury, pharmaceutical companies and physicians hold no medical liability. Do you know any other industry in which companies are not liable for defects or damages that result from the poor performance of their products? How about an industry who has zero responsibility for damages caused by their products? There are not any. This privilege is reserved to the pharmaceutical industry alone.

Another case of alleged “small, insignificant exposure” to dangerous chemicals is food products, which are laden with synthetically made conservatives, colors and flavors.

In case you need to see it on mainstream media to believe it, here is a report from CNN in which it is explained how 7 chemicals that are understood as safe for human consumption by health authorities, are actually poisonous for those who ingest them. Among them are: Azodicarbonamide, which is used in bread. Tartrazine, an artificial color that is used in thousands of food products. It is better known as Yellow No. 5 and No. 6.

Another toxic combination is that of Propyl gallate and butylated hydroxytoluene. Both are used as preservatives to keep manufactured food products from going bad and lasting longer on the shelf. Along with these two is Sodium nitrite, which is used for preservation and coloring of packaged meats.

Next comes tert-Butylhydroquinone, which is a form of butane. It is added to crackers, potato chips and some fast food. Similarly, Silicon dioxide is also added to food products such as “dry coffee creamer, dried soups and other powdery foods. It is also used as an insect repellent, removing the oily film that covers an insect’s body, causing them to dry out and die.”

This article concentrated on vaccines and some unknown chemicals added to foods, and leaves out some traditional offenders, such as BPA, MSG, hydrogenated oils, aspartame and hormone-bending chemicals, because we have already written about them before. Also, because both vaccines and food products are popularly exempted from scrutiny under the excuse that the small amounts of disease-causing chemicals they contain are easily disposed of by the human body, which is also a lie. It is important to remember that even if our bodies had the ability to get rid of some chemicals, the damage caused by them takes place before they are excreted out.

With so much land available to plant clean food and so much science available to create medicines that actually benefit our health, it is more than shocking to learn that there are people out there who still believe in 19th-century “snake oil” style solutions to their health problems or that people prefer consuming food products which are contaminated with hundreds of toxic substances put in them on purpose, despite the well-known dangers posed by them.

Knowing what to do about the chemicals in vaccines and food products is as simple as asking yourself the following question: Would I voluntarily ingest mercury, formaldehyde, anti-freeze, lead or cadmium? If the answer is NO, it would be necessary to ask why then would I ingest these and other chemicals in food or inject them into a child or an adult? If the answer YES, by all means knock yourself out. Inject away and eat away without remorse.

http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/no-poison-is-good-for-you-in-small-doses/

WebMD And Monsanto Propaganda

LiarBy The Sleuth Journal

If you’re one of the nearly 12 million people who visit WebMD.com every month, you’re getting a healthy dose of Monsanto propaganda along with your “health research.”

Monsanto is one of the many corporate “sponsors” of WebMD. That means Monsanto pays WebMD in order to pepper WebMD’s website with advertisements and advertorials, disguised as legitimate journalism.

WebMD Health Corp. (NASDAQ: WBMD) is a publicly held corporation that answers first and foremost to its shareholders. The company, with its long history of deceiving consumers and partnering up with drug, junk food and biotech companies, is not, and never was, in the business of caring about consumers—a fact meticulously documented in an article published this week (January 19, 2016) by Mercola.com.

Why bother to ask one corrupt corporation, WebMD, to cut ties with another, equally or exceedingly corrupt corporation (Monsanto)?

Because Monsanto’s WebMD propaganda is cleverly disguised as legitimate health advice. So cleverly, that millions of visitors to the site probably have no idea that they’re being duped.

http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/call-the-doctor/

Monsanto Sues Over Action To Classify Glyphosate As Carcinogen (VIDEO)

Monsanto-1-640x480-600x450By The Sleuth Journal

Monsanto has decided to move forward with suing California over the listing of a particular herbicide ingredient as a carcinogen. The company is allegedly seeking to prevent the main ingredient of their Roundup product from being added to the state’s list of known carcinogens and they’ve filed a lawsuit against the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). They are allegedly working to keep their ingredient glyphosate off the Proposition 65 list of chemicals that are known to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.

Last year, the OEHHA said that it had the intention to add glyphosate to the list of carcinogens after the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) effectively classified the ingredient as a probable human carcinogen. Monsanto doesn’t agree with the allegations or assessment, they continue to claim that the chemical is safe and that it is unlikely to cause cancer. Glyphosate is one of the most commonly used agricultural chemicals in the United States. If this chemical does make it onto the list, then Monsanto and other companies who use it would need to start warning their customers that the chemical is known to cause cancer.

If glyphosate does end-up on the Prop. 65 list, then the use of any product containing it would also be limited; as many municipalities look to avoid and even prohibit the use of chemicals on the Prop. 65 list.  Monsanto says that this move will damage their reputation and negatively impact their sales. Just in 2015 alone, Roundup earned Monsanto over $4 billion in revenue. The Vice President of regulator affairs at Monsanto, Phil Miller, maintains that glyphosate is “an efficient, effective, and safe tool for weed control.”

Despite the glowing reassurance from Monsanto officials that there is nothing to worry about when it comes to their company or its products, an increasing number of countries have been turning to avoid using GMO products from biotech companies like Monsanto. Now that technology has made it easier than ever for consumers to research and find out the truth behind various products and companies in the market, and to share that knowledge with others around the world, there remains an increasing consumer awareness trend that isn’t showing much affection for Monsanto and the products that it puts out.

Watch the Video here:http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/monsanto-sues-over-action-to-classify-glyphosate-as-carcinogen/

How Do You Know When Your Society Is In The Midst Of Collapse?

boot-paintingBy Brandon Smith

As economic turmoil worldwide becomes increasingly apparent, I have been receiving messages from readers expressing some concerns on the public “perception” of collapse. That is to say, there are questions on the average person’s concept of collapse versus the reality of collapse. This is a vital issue that I have discussed briefly in the past, but it deserves a more in-depth analysis.

What is collapse? How do we define it? And, are some of the notions of collapse in the public consciousness completely wrong?

It’s funny, because skeptics opposed to the idea of a U.S. collapse in particular will most often retort with a question they think I cannot or will not answer – “So, Mr. Smith, when specifically is this supposed collapse going to take place? What day and time?”

My response has always been – “We’re in the middle of a collapse right now; you really can’t see it right in front of your sneering face?”

The reason these people are incapable of grasping this kind of answer is in large part due to the popular mainstream conceptions of systemic collapse. These are conceptions that are for the most part delusional and not in line with the facts. The public idea of collapse comes predominantly from Hollywood, and not from personal experience. For the masses (and some preppers, unfortunately), a collapse is an “event” that happens visibly and usually swiftly. You wake up one morning and behold; the television and phones don’t work anymore and zombies are at your doorstep! Yes, it’s childish and cartoonish, but anything less than a Walking Dead/Mad Max scenario and many people act as if all other threats are benign.

This is the driving reason why many Americans are absolutely oblivious to the economic instability that is rampant and blatant within our system the past few months. They might see the same signals that alternative analysts see, but these signals do not register in their brains as dangers.

Look at it this way; say you told a person their whole life that a tiger is a 10-foot tall behemoth with four heads that breath fire while urinating flesh-rending acid. Say you make movies and TV shows about it and they never have any experience to the contrary. When they finally come across a real tiger, they might try to pet the damn thing instead of running in terror or searching for a means of defense.

To use another vicious animal analogy, when I encounter skeptics with false assumptions of what a collapse actually is, I am often reminded of that woman in Anchorage, Alaska who jumped an enclosure fence at the zoo to get a closer picture of Binky the polar bear. These people have been made so inept when it comes to identifying threats that they will continue arguing with you as the animal takes a football-sized bite out of their meaty thigh.

So what is the root of the problem beyond Hollywood fantasies? Well, the problem is that social and economic collapse is not a singular event, it is a PROCESS. Collapse is a series of events that sometimes span years. Each event increases in volatility over the last event, but as time goes on these events tend to condition the masses. The public develops a normalcy bias towards crisis (like the old “frog in a boiling pot” analogy). They lose all sense of what a healthy system looks like.

It is not uncommon for a society to wade through almost a decade or more of violent decline before finally acknowledging the system is imploding on a fundamental level. It is also not uncommon for societies to endure years of abuse by corrupt governments before either organizing effectively to rebel, or caving in and submitting to totalitarianism.

But how does one recognize a failing system? How does a person know if they are in the middle of a collapse rather than on the “verge” of collapse? Here are some signals I have derived from research of various breakdowns in modern nations and why they indicate we are experiencing collapse right now…

The Criminals Openly Admit To Their Crimes

The surest way to know if your society is in the midst of disintegration is to see if the criminals who created the instability in the first place are openly discussing a collapse scenario or warning that one is imminent.

A year ago, central bankers presented little more than a chorus of recovery propaganda. Today, not so much. The Royal Bank of Scotland is now warning investors to “sell everything” ahead of a “cataclysmic” year in markets.

The Federal Reserve’s Richard Fisher has admitted that the Fed “frontloaded” (manipulated) stock markets into a bubble and that payment is about to come due in the form of severe economic volatility (up to 20% crash in equities).

The Bank for International Settlements, the central bank of central banks, has a track record of warning the public about collapse conditions – right before they happen, leaving little or no time for people to prepare. They have followed their habit by warning in September and December that a Fed rate hike would “shatter” the uneasy calm in markets.

The former Chief Economist of the BIS now says the economy is in worse shape than it was in 2008 and is headed for a larger fall.

What happened between last year and this year and why are these internationalists suddenly so forthcoming about our economic reality? The fact that central bankers are the cause of our current collapse leads me to believe that such admissions are designed to deflect guilt. If they put out a few warnings now, they can then later claim they are prognosticators rather than culprits, and that they were trying to “help us.” Beyond that, the reality is that our situation was just as dire in 2014/2015 as it is today; the difference is that now we are about to enter a new phase in the ongoing collapse, a much more detrimental phase, but still a phase of a breakdown that has been progressing since at least 2008.

The Fundamentals Break Through The Manipulation Barrier

Governments and central banks do not have the capacity to artificially create demand for goods or a supply of well-paying jobs in a crashing economy. What they can do, though, is hide the visible problems in supply and demand with false numbers.

I examined such false economic statistics in great detail last year in a six-part series titled “One Last Look At The Real Economy Before It Implodes.” I will not cover them all again here. I would only point out that recently the fundamentals of supply and demand have begun to break through the deceit of manipulated numbers, and this is a sign that the collapse is about to move from one stage to the next.

With global shipping and trucking freight in steep decline, with retail inventories in stasis and current oil consumption falling to levels not seen since 1997 despite a larger population, the mainstream can no longer deny that consumer demand is crumbling. If demand is falling dramatically, then the financial system is in the middle of falling dramatically; there is simply no way around this truth.

Stocks And Commodities Become Violently Erratic

Let’s be clear, if stock markets represent anything at all, they are merely lagging indicators of economic instability.  Stock markets are NOT predictive indicators of anything useful.  Therefore, any person who does nothing but track equities each day is going to be completely oblivious to the bigger picture behind the economy until it is too late.  They will be so mesmerized by the green numbers and red numbers and lines on minute-to-minute graphs that they will lose all sense of reality.

Violent swings in stocks are a sign of a financial system that is at the middle or end of the collapse process, not the beginning.

It is also important to note that extreme shifts in stocks and commodity values to the upside are just as much a signal of instability as shifts to the downside.  For instance, if you witnessed the recent 9% explosion in oil markets and thought to yourself “Ah, the markets are being stabilized again and nothing is different this time…”, then you are an idiot.

Of course, the next day oil markets lost almost all of the gains they made the day before.  And this is how markets behave when they are about to die; they expand and implode chaotically each day on nothing more that meaningless news headlines rather than hard data.  This heart attack in equities inevitably trends downwards as the weeks and months pass.  Keep in mind, equities are down nearly 10% from their recent highs, and oil is down approximately 50% in the past six months.  Every time there is a dead cat bounce in stocks skeptics come out of the woodwork to call alternative analysts “doomers”, yet they are nowhere to be found when markets come crashing back down.  They are not looking at the overall trend because their short attention spans hinder them.  Again, extreme swings in markets, whether up or down, are a sign of progressing collapse.

Deterioration Of Cultural Values, Heritage And Identity

I have written extensively over the years about the Cloward-Piven strategy; a strategy used by collectivists to destabilize social systems by dumping overt numbers of foreign immigrants into the population without demand for integration. This process has been obvious in the U.S. and Europe for quite some time, but only now is it peaking to the point that collapse is seen as an inevitable result by the public. Europe is worse off than the U.S. in this regard as millions upon millions of Muslim immigrants are injected into the EU’s already dying body; immigrants that intend to transplant their culture from their own failed societies rather than adopting the values and principles of the societies that have invited them in.

Natural-born Americans and legal immigrants with aspiration of integration appear to be fighting back against the Cloward-Piven strategy with some success by holding onto traditional American values despite being labeled “barbarians” and “racists.” Illegal immigration, though, is still completely unchecked.

In the EU, the long campaign of cultural Marxism has made natural-born Europeans perhaps the most self-hating people on the planet as well as the most passive and weak. Organized opposition to massive immigration programs in the EU should have taken place years ago. Now it is far too late, and the European system is finishing a social implosion which should have already been obvious to average citizens.

Open Discussion Of Totalitarian Measures

When corrupt leadership moves from quiet totalitarianism to more open totalitarianism, your society is in the FINAL stages of collapse, not the beginning of a collapse. The U.S. in particular has been slowly strangled with subversive legal directives and political policies ever since the so called “War on Terror” began. However, there are now multiple signals of a much deeper and open tyranny in the works.

A few recent examples stand out, including Barack Obama’s insistence that the office of the president has the legal authority to issues executive orders that affect constitutional protections such as the 2nd Amendment. As many liberty movement activists are aware, there is absolutely no constitutional precedent for the use of executive orders and such powers are not mentioned anywhere in the document. They were simply created out of thin air to be used by the federal government and sometimes state governments to supersede normal checks and balances.

While numerous presidents have issued executive orders, including some that were outright tyrannical, like Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s unconstitutional internment of Japanese Americans into concentration camps, George W. Bush and Barack Obama have been the most subversive in their bypassing of the Constitution. Obama, in particular, has tried to hide the number of executive actions he has taken by issuing hundreds of “presidential memorandums,” which are basically the same dirty play by another name.

These actions have been progressively setting the stage for the removal of checks and balances entirely in the name of crisis management. They are so broad in their nature and vague in their definitions and applications that they could be interpreted by federal authorities to mean just about anything in any given situation.

If executive actions are not scary enough, corrupt politicians are now becoming blunt in their demands for dominance. Two Republican Senators, Mitch McConnel and Lindsay Graham, are calling for unlimited AUMF-style (authorization of use of military force) war powers to be given to the president. Such powers would allow the president to project U.S. military forces anywhere in the world for any reason without review or time limits. This includes the use of military forces on U.S. soil.

The rationale for this is, of course, the threat of ISIS. The same group of terrorists the U.S. government helped to create.

And finally, if you want perhaps the most nonchalant admission of future tyranny in recent days, check out former General Wesley Clark’s call for “disloyal” Americans to be placed in internment camps through the duration of the war on terror, a war that could ostensibly go on forever.

http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/how-do-you-know-when-your-society-is-in-the-midst-of-collapse/

The Psychology Of “Lockdown”

police-state-By Bernie Suarez

How It Has Been Used to Make Martial Law the Norm.

The establishment has been working hard over the past few years to make martial law the norm in the United States.

A few events which are most responsible for the normalization of martial law stand out in most of our minds.

First there was the frightening gun confiscation and private home intrusion seen in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Particularly after the flooding in New Orleans. Many people witnessed for the first time the real horrors of martial law as militarized police, the National Guard and FEMA all operating until Federal orders bullied ordinary civilians around forcing them out of their homes and into a FEMA camp set up at public arenas. At the time, no one was used to seeing this here in America. But after a while people carried on with their business, but the memory of the arguably acceptable martial law scene playing out in the case of a natural disaster stayed in everyone’s memory.

Then 8 years later on April 15, 2013 we had the staged Boston bombing pressure cooker detonations at the Boston Marathon. We all know the story, how within the following days the establishment cooked up the “chase” for the real perpetrators which they used to officially introduce the “lockdown” concept. I warned about this then. To this day I firmly believe the Boston bombing was set up to show America how an “event” can and will be used to lock down a town or a city.

As with Katrina, in the Watertown MA lockdown we saw illegal and forceful home invasions as militarized police forced their way into people’s homes and forced people out of their own homes in the name of looking for “terrorists” who supposedly were responsible for the “attacks”. No one questioned the lying crisis actors running around with fake bright red blood stains on the ground and Hollywood style torn clothings. No one questioned the actor rolling around in a wheelchair pretending his leg was just blown off while looking robust, oriented, wide awake and with a full colored face. For that matter, no one questioned all the Craft International mercenaries clearly scene on camera communicating, preparing and monitoring the scene of the “controlled explosion”. Instead all the focus soon went to the chase, the lockdown and the eventual murder of one of the accused men.

Fast forward to November 13, 2015 where we saw a series of bizarre supposed shootings that were all attributed to CIA’s ISIS. Strikingly, the event lacked the expected unedited evidence you would expect from a mass shooting in a large city, living in a technological world where almost everyone carries a video camera on their cell phone.

Without getting into the details of the Paris attacks of, the one important thing that everyone must pay attention to is that the event was used to again “lockdown” all of Paris and even other parts of Europe. After the Paris attacks there was even talk in New York City and other cities in the US about heightened alert and such.

The point I made at the time of the Paris attacks was that the “event” was used to trigger police activity in other parts of the world. The “lockdown” concept had just grown to the next level.

As “lockdown” is rolled to the general public as the new norm, is anyone asking, what is lockdown? Or, why it is necessary?

First I want to say that the entire concept of lockdown is a lie, an illusion, it’s another psychological operation on the general public and here’s why:

1– “Lockdown” is based on the delusion that we are all living in one big stadium or locker room that needs to be purged one locker at a time for there to be true justice or for the government to keep you “safe”. Of course thinking that it’s the government’s job to keep you safe is another delusion in itself.

2– The “lockdown” psyop delusion makes everyone think that if police can barge into anyone’s home at will, then they will have the tools they need to catch the bad guys.

3– The “lockdown” psyop delusion is based on the assumption that police are chasing the correct suspect. The idea that vigilante killings (Chris Dorner), patsies (Boston bombing), or that staged shooting (San Bernardino, Umpqua, Virginia TV Reporter etc) are now the norm, is not even part of the equation. Thus the lockdowns are based strictly on government and mass media controlled unchecked “evidence”, in other words propaganda.

4– The “lockdown” psyop delusion is based on the idea that a lockdown actually works when in fact there are no historical examples where a lockdown was the direct tool that allowed police to catch a criminal. Criminals have been caught since the beginning of time without the concept of lockdown. In fact, in today’s world of high technology and government surveillance it is now easier than ever to get caught by police. More than ever, it is getting very difficult for criminals to hide from the control system. Therefore more than at any point in history the concept of lockdown is NOT needed. It only serves as a tool to anger law abiding citizens, trash the Constitution, and empower a tyrannical government.

Expanding the lockdown psyop

After 9/11 the word “terrorist” was the buzzword to get everyone worried in fear and bowing to federal government tyranny. For years, all you had to say was “terrorist” or “terrorism” and most Americans would give way to the Federal government tyrannical forces.

But now that the “terrorist” buzzword has lost a lot of its power due to overuse, the control system has had a lot of time to improve their Neuro-linguistic mind control on the general public and they’ve added quite a few terms to their mass mind programming.

To expand their mass mind control the control system has now linked numerous other phrases to trigger public expected government and police behavior. The phrases “active shooter”, “gunman”, “extremist” and even “manhunt” are now all linked to “lockdown”. Look for these buzz words with the next shooting event. In fact here is the latest “active shooter” event recently reported out of San Diego Naval Medical Center. The article states:

“An active shooter and three gunshots were reported at the U.S. Naval Medical Center in San Diego on Tuesday, triggering a law enforcement response although there were no reports of deaths or injuries.

The U.S. Navy said in a statement, based on initial reports from a witness, that three shots were heard in the basement of a building housing a gym and barracks at the medical center around 8 a.m. PST (1600 GMT).

First responders and Navy working dog units were on scene clearing the building where the shots were heard, the statement said, adding that the medical center was on lockdown and a shelter-in-place order had been given.

A post on the medical center’s Facebook page advised occupants to “run, hide or fight,” the protocol advised by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in response to an active shooter.

The critical thing I would like for everyone to observe about this recent story is that gunshots were “heard”. No one knows anything else (as of the time of this story). Also note that no one died. But despite this minimal amount activity reported notice how the situation automatically demands that the entire medical center is on lockdown. Also notice how the Department of Homeland Security is already involved. Isn’t it strange how the DHS ALWAYS seems to be in the neighborhood snooping around almost always having “drills” prior to or during these “shooting” events? I think it is highly suspicious that DHS is even mentioned in this story tied to “lockdown” and “active shooter”.

This is another reminder that the new world order is trying to force itself on all of us and now the general public is expected to immediately stand down and allow the federal government and militarized police to do whatever they please as soon as these Neuro-linguistic conditioning psyop terms are put out by the mainstream media. This latest story is a textbook example of this programming.

No one should be fooled by these psychological tactics and clever word games. It’s all part of the delusion being imposed on the masses. The bottom line is that “lockdown” is just another buzz word for martial law and lockdowns don’t work except for those trying to impose tyranny. The lesson to learn here is that there are no words that any American should accept as an acceptable buzzword to allow the justification of martial law. We must be aware of how we are being manipulated otherwise we’ll never solve the problems we face now.

Let’s do everything we can to expose the process by which the control system slowly establishes their control over the masses. Understanding how they use key words is a central part of this strategy. If you understand this and agree please share this message with others.

http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/the-psychology-of-lockdown/

More than half the plastic in the ocean comes from these five countries

surfing-in-trash-filled-oceanThere’s a new report out this week about ocean plastics, the man-made debris that floats and sinks in global waterways and often lands in marine creatures’ stomachs. According to the study, which was a collaborative effort by McKinsey & Co.’s environmental business unit and the nonprofit Ocean Conservancy, roughly 60% of all the plastic in global waters originates in five countries: China, the Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia, and Vietnam.

Around the world, most of the trash that gets into the ocean comes from land, not from cruise ships or fishing boats. On land, plastic can “leak” from collection sites to the ocean, but it’s much more likely to reach the ocean if it’s never collected formally in the first place.

None of the countries identified in the report as “the five focus countries for action” to reduce global plastic pollution has a formal recycling system. What they do have are “waste pickers,” who root through garbage piles to find reusable items to sell for cash. These people “are the unsung heroes of conservation” in Asia, as GlobalPost puts it, but they need more support. The McKinsey/Ocean Conservancy report says “their inclusion and empowerment, along with recognition of their working conditions and long-term plans to upgrade those conditions, should be an explicit goal.”

After all, only about 20% of discarded plastic is valuable enough to be of interest to a waste-picker. Plastic bags, for example, don’t get collected.

These developing economies in Asia generate relatively little waste per capita, especially compared to western capitalist consumer ones. But the waste-management infrastructure makes all the difference. China has the most “land-based plastic-waste leakage” of any country in the world, according to the report’s authors, who traveled to China and the four other “focus countries” to assess how local plastic waste gets collected, stored, and eliminated. They note:

“Our field research and interviews with public officials have also shown that these countries acknowledge the problem and are actively looking for collaborative solutions.”

The authors recommend “a $5 billion annual ramp-up in waste-management spending” over the next 10 years as a meaningful way to improve things.

plastic rubbishhttp://qz.com/595673/more-than-half-the-plastic-in-the-ocean-comes-from-these-five-countries/

Drone Footage Documents Utter Devastation in Post-War Syria

devastation syria

By Activist Post

A crew from RT launched a drone to capture video of the destruction of the city of Homs in Syria.  Before the destablization campaign was fully underway, Homs was once a key industrial center.  The population of over 1 million people now have the following city in which to live.  Unfortunately, it is a before-and-after scene that we have witnessed before in the once-prosperous country of Libya.

WATCH VIDEO: Aerial Drone footage shows TOTAL Devastation in Homs, Syria http://www.activistpost.com/2016/01/drone-footage-documents-utter-devastation-in-post-war-syria.html?

Electric Cars Just As Dirty As Petroleum-powered Vehicles? New study sheds light on ‘zero emissions’ fraud

electric carBy

Electric cars may end up being worse for the climate and for human health than gasoline-fueled vehicles, depending on whether coal or some other source is being used for electricity generation, according to a study conducted by researchers from the University of Minnesota and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in December 2014.

Ethanol-fueled vehicles are also worse than gasoline-powered ones, the study found.

“A lot of the technologies that we think of as being clean … are not better than gasoline,” co-author Julian Marshall said.

“Unfortunately, when a wire is connected to an electric vehicle at one end and a coal-fired power plant at the other end, the environmental consequences are worse than driving a normal gasoline-powered car,” said Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science, who was not involved in the study.

Coal is primary U.S. electricity source

Studies conducted by Climate Central in 2012 and 2013 had showed that the greenhouse gas emissions of vehicles running off electricity sourced from coal were worse than those of gasoline-powered vehicles. The new study confirmed those prior findings and also expanded them to encompass health impacts of various energy sources.

The researchers examined 10 different ways to power automobiles, including gasoline, diesel, liquid biofuels, compressed natural gas and electricity from a variety of sources, both conventional and alternative. They then calculated all the air pollution emitted from the process of producing the fuels (or batteries or electricity), as well as the pollution emitted during the vehicle’s operation. They then estimated the health and climate effects of these emissions.

Researcher Jason Hill emphasized that just looking at the emissions from a vehicle’s tailpipe can dramatically underestimate a fuel source’s health and environmental impact. For example, ethanol fuels are also responsible for air pollution released from the vehicles used to grow the corn, from the soil following the application of fertilizer, and from the process of fermenting and distilling the corn into ethanol.

When it come to electric vehicles, the source of the electricity is the key question. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, 39 percent of the country’s electricity comes from coal, 27 percent from natural gas, about 20 percent from nuclear power, 7 percent from dams or water turbines, and 6 percent from all other sources.

Coal, ethanol more lethal than gasoline

The researchers found that electric cars run from coal actually kill 360 percent more people than cars run from gasoline, due to increased soot and smog emissions. They also emit significantly more carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas.

In contrast, natural gas-powered electric cars would only kill half as many people as gasoline-powered cars. Electric cars powered from wind or water energy would cause only 25 percent as many air-pollution-related deaths. Hybrid and diesel engines were also lower-impact than gasoline engines.

Ethanol, in contrast, causes 80 percent more air pollution-related deaths than gasoline, and also emits more greenhouse gases.

“If we’re using ethanol for environmental benefits, for air quality and climate change, we’re going down the wrong path,” Hill said.

“Any honest accounting of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies must… consider the possibility of unintended consequences,” said Timothy Johnson of Duke University, who was not involved in the study.

Johnson noted that other impacts of different energy sources might include local environmental effects of producing or using the fuels, such as increased air pollution from truck traffic to ethanol refineries.

“While these considerations go beyond the paper’s focus on air quality, the study reminds us that we need to widen our analytical boundaries if we are going to address greenhouse gas emissions sustainably,” Johnson said.

Another impact might be destruction of water supplies due to mining for raw materials for solar panels, batteries or other alternative energy sources.

Monsanto’s New GM Wheat Will Increase Spraying of Three Toxic Herbicides

As reported on Natural News by David Gutierrez in October of 2014: “A field of unregulated genetically modified (GM) wheat has been discovered growing wild in Montana, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has announced. No varieties of GM wheat have been approved for cultivation in the United States, but this is the second plot discovered growing on its own in less than a year and a half.”

Do you think those two plots of genetically modified wheat are the only two out there? When wheat carries the traits of “herbicide resistance,” that means more and more herbicide will have to be sprayed as the weeds become resistant too. Agrochemical giant Monsanto is at it again, developing GM herbicide-resistant wheat. This time around, the wheat will be resistant to THREE different chemical herbicides: glyphosate, glufosinate and dicamba. Back in 2013, an Oregon farmer found Monsanto’s original “Roundup Ready” wheat growing in his fields. Monsanto had claimed to stop developing that line altogether about 10 years ago, but they obviously lied. It’s like the Cold War with these corporations — they agree not to do something and then they go double down and work harder on it. Monsanto had actually RESTARTED extensive field trials in 2011. Of course, the USDA called it an isolated incident and just couldn’t figure out how it could have happened in an Oregon field. Sure.

“Whole grains” aren’t so “whole” when you’re eating genetically modified organisms

Every farmer in America who doesn’t pollute his/her crop with chemicals and who doesn’t buy seeds that contain chemicals (GMO) deserves a subsidy bonus check from their country and a “do it yourself” lab kit that allows them to test their fields and crops for GMO contamination. If the FDA and USDA weren’t so darned crooked and corrupt, we would be living this way. In 2012 alone, the US exported wheat at a value estimated over $18 billion. How much of that wheat was genetically modified and got through as otherwise?

Over 60 countries have bans on GM crops. After the Oregon GM wheat discovery, Japan and the entire EU enacted serious barriers and restrictions on their import of wheat. Farmers immediately launched lawsuits against Monsanto, but Monsanto has previous “members” serving as high as Supreme Court Justices, so that could end ugly, but Monsanto still settled in the millions, most likely to keep the whole topic hush hush so the American masses won’t panic and stop buying all that INFLAMMATORY WHEAT.

You can’t wash off GMO

Roundup Ready farming is failing. That is why Monsanto is making new herbicide-tolerance GM crops — to fight back against the superweeds and superbugs these chemicals themselves created. But Mother Nature is evolving faster, just as it is with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The new GMO will be more of the same nightmare, but even more superweeds and superbugs to overcome, that are smarter and stronger anything mankind can “concoct” in a laboratory.

Start questioning everything that’s not certified organic.