The Psychology Of “Lockdown”

police-state-By Bernie Suarez

How It Has Been Used to Make Martial Law the Norm.

The establishment has been working hard over the past few years to make martial law the norm in the United States.

A few events which are most responsible for the normalization of martial law stand out in most of our minds.

First there was the frightening gun confiscation and private home intrusion seen in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Particularly after the flooding in New Orleans. Many people witnessed for the first time the real horrors of martial law as militarized police, the National Guard and FEMA all operating until Federal orders bullied ordinary civilians around forcing them out of their homes and into a FEMA camp set up at public arenas. At the time, no one was used to seeing this here in America. But after a while people carried on with their business, but the memory of the arguably acceptable martial law scene playing out in the case of a natural disaster stayed in everyone’s memory.

Then 8 years later on April 15, 2013 we had the staged Boston bombing pressure cooker detonations at the Boston Marathon. We all know the story, how within the following days the establishment cooked up the “chase” for the real perpetrators which they used to officially introduce the “lockdown” concept. I warned about this then. To this day I firmly believe the Boston bombing was set up to show America how an “event” can and will be used to lock down a town or a city.

As with Katrina, in the Watertown MA lockdown we saw illegal and forceful home invasions as militarized police forced their way into people’s homes and forced people out of their own homes in the name of looking for “terrorists” who supposedly were responsible for the “attacks”. No one questioned the lying crisis actors running around with fake bright red blood stains on the ground and Hollywood style torn clothings. No one questioned the actor rolling around in a wheelchair pretending his leg was just blown off while looking robust, oriented, wide awake and with a full colored face. For that matter, no one questioned all the Craft International mercenaries clearly scene on camera communicating, preparing and monitoring the scene of the “controlled explosion”. Instead all the focus soon went to the chase, the lockdown and the eventual murder of one of the accused men.

Fast forward to November 13, 2015 where we saw a series of bizarre supposed shootings that were all attributed to CIA’s ISIS. Strikingly, the event lacked the expected unedited evidence you would expect from a mass shooting in a large city, living in a technological world where almost everyone carries a video camera on their cell phone.

Without getting into the details of the Paris attacks of, the one important thing that everyone must pay attention to is that the event was used to again “lockdown” all of Paris and even other parts of Europe. After the Paris attacks there was even talk in New York City and other cities in the US about heightened alert and such.

The point I made at the time of the Paris attacks was that the “event” was used to trigger police activity in other parts of the world. The “lockdown” concept had just grown to the next level.

As “lockdown” is rolled to the general public as the new norm, is anyone asking, what is lockdown? Or, why it is necessary?

First I want to say that the entire concept of lockdown is a lie, an illusion, it’s another psychological operation on the general public and here’s why:

1– “Lockdown” is based on the delusion that we are all living in one big stadium or locker room that needs to be purged one locker at a time for there to be true justice or for the government to keep you “safe”. Of course thinking that it’s the government’s job to keep you safe is another delusion in itself.

2– The “lockdown” psyop delusion makes everyone think that if police can barge into anyone’s home at will, then they will have the tools they need to catch the bad guys.

3– The “lockdown” psyop delusion is based on the assumption that police are chasing the correct suspect. The idea that vigilante killings (Chris Dorner), patsies (Boston bombing), or that staged shooting (San Bernardino, Umpqua, Virginia TV Reporter etc) are now the norm, is not even part of the equation. Thus the lockdowns are based strictly on government and mass media controlled unchecked “evidence”, in other words propaganda.

4– The “lockdown” psyop delusion is based on the idea that a lockdown actually works when in fact there are no historical examples where a lockdown was the direct tool that allowed police to catch a criminal. Criminals have been caught since the beginning of time without the concept of lockdown. In fact, in today’s world of high technology and government surveillance it is now easier than ever to get caught by police. More than ever, it is getting very difficult for criminals to hide from the control system. Therefore more than at any point in history the concept of lockdown is NOT needed. It only serves as a tool to anger law abiding citizens, trash the Constitution, and empower a tyrannical government.

Expanding the lockdown psyop

After 9/11 the word “terrorist” was the buzzword to get everyone worried in fear and bowing to federal government tyranny. For years, all you had to say was “terrorist” or “terrorism” and most Americans would give way to the Federal government tyrannical forces.

But now that the “terrorist” buzzword has lost a lot of its power due to overuse, the control system has had a lot of time to improve their Neuro-linguistic mind control on the general public and they’ve added quite a few terms to their mass mind programming.

To expand their mass mind control the control system has now linked numerous other phrases to trigger public expected government and police behavior. The phrases “active shooter”, “gunman”, “extremist” and even “manhunt” are now all linked to “lockdown”. Look for these buzz words with the next shooting event. In fact here is the latest “active shooter” event recently reported out of San Diego Naval Medical Center. The article states:

“An active shooter and three gunshots were reported at the U.S. Naval Medical Center in San Diego on Tuesday, triggering a law enforcement response although there were no reports of deaths or injuries.

The U.S. Navy said in a statement, based on initial reports from a witness, that three shots were heard in the basement of a building housing a gym and barracks at the medical center around 8 a.m. PST (1600 GMT).

First responders and Navy working dog units were on scene clearing the building where the shots were heard, the statement said, adding that the medical center was on lockdown and a shelter-in-place order had been given.

A post on the medical center’s Facebook page advised occupants to “run, hide or fight,” the protocol advised by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in response to an active shooter.

The critical thing I would like for everyone to observe about this recent story is that gunshots were “heard”. No one knows anything else (as of the time of this story). Also note that no one died. But despite this minimal amount activity reported notice how the situation automatically demands that the entire medical center is on lockdown. Also notice how the Department of Homeland Security is already involved. Isn’t it strange how the DHS ALWAYS seems to be in the neighborhood snooping around almost always having “drills” prior to or during these “shooting” events? I think it is highly suspicious that DHS is even mentioned in this story tied to “lockdown” and “active shooter”.

This is another reminder that the new world order is trying to force itself on all of us and now the general public is expected to immediately stand down and allow the federal government and militarized police to do whatever they please as soon as these Neuro-linguistic conditioning psyop terms are put out by the mainstream media. This latest story is a textbook example of this programming.

No one should be fooled by these psychological tactics and clever word games. It’s all part of the delusion being imposed on the masses. The bottom line is that “lockdown” is just another buzz word for martial law and lockdowns don’t work except for those trying to impose tyranny. The lesson to learn here is that there are no words that any American should accept as an acceptable buzzword to allow the justification of martial law. We must be aware of how we are being manipulated otherwise we’ll never solve the problems we face now.

Let’s do everything we can to expose the process by which the control system slowly establishes their control over the masses. Understanding how they use key words is a central part of this strategy. If you understand this and agree please share this message with others.

http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/the-psychology-of-lockdown/

More than half the plastic in the ocean comes from these five countries

surfing-in-trash-filled-oceanThere’s a new report out this week about ocean plastics, the man-made debris that floats and sinks in global waterways and often lands in marine creatures’ stomachs. According to the study, which was a collaborative effort by McKinsey & Co.’s environmental business unit and the nonprofit Ocean Conservancy, roughly 60% of all the plastic in global waters originates in five countries: China, the Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia, and Vietnam.

Around the world, most of the trash that gets into the ocean comes from land, not from cruise ships or fishing boats. On land, plastic can “leak” from collection sites to the ocean, but it’s much more likely to reach the ocean if it’s never collected formally in the first place.

None of the countries identified in the report as “the five focus countries for action” to reduce global plastic pollution has a formal recycling system. What they do have are “waste pickers,” who root through garbage piles to find reusable items to sell for cash. These people “are the unsung heroes of conservation” in Asia, as GlobalPost puts it, but they need more support. The McKinsey/Ocean Conservancy report says “their inclusion and empowerment, along with recognition of their working conditions and long-term plans to upgrade those conditions, should be an explicit goal.”

After all, only about 20% of discarded plastic is valuable enough to be of interest to a waste-picker. Plastic bags, for example, don’t get collected.

These developing economies in Asia generate relatively little waste per capita, especially compared to western capitalist consumer ones. But the waste-management infrastructure makes all the difference. China has the most “land-based plastic-waste leakage” of any country in the world, according to the report’s authors, who traveled to China and the four other “focus countries” to assess how local plastic waste gets collected, stored, and eliminated. They note:

“Our field research and interviews with public officials have also shown that these countries acknowledge the problem and are actively looking for collaborative solutions.”

The authors recommend “a $5 billion annual ramp-up in waste-management spending” over the next 10 years as a meaningful way to improve things.

plastic rubbishhttp://qz.com/595673/more-than-half-the-plastic-in-the-ocean-comes-from-these-five-countries/

Drone Footage Documents Utter Devastation in Post-War Syria

devastation syria

By Activist Post

A crew from RT launched a drone to capture video of the destruction of the city of Homs in Syria.  Before the destablization campaign was fully underway, Homs was once a key industrial center.  The population of over 1 million people now have the following city in which to live.  Unfortunately, it is a before-and-after scene that we have witnessed before in the once-prosperous country of Libya.

WATCH VIDEO: Aerial Drone footage shows TOTAL Devastation in Homs, Syria http://www.activistpost.com/2016/01/drone-footage-documents-utter-devastation-in-post-war-syria.html?

Electric Cars Just As Dirty As Petroleum-powered Vehicles? New study sheds light on ‘zero emissions’ fraud

electric carBy

Electric cars may end up being worse for the climate and for human health than gasoline-fueled vehicles, depending on whether coal or some other source is being used for electricity generation, according to a study conducted by researchers from the University of Minnesota and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in December 2014.

Ethanol-fueled vehicles are also worse than gasoline-powered ones, the study found.

“A lot of the technologies that we think of as being clean … are not better than gasoline,” co-author Julian Marshall said.

“Unfortunately, when a wire is connected to an electric vehicle at one end and a coal-fired power plant at the other end, the environmental consequences are worse than driving a normal gasoline-powered car,” said Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science, who was not involved in the study.

Coal is primary U.S. electricity source

Studies conducted by Climate Central in 2012 and 2013 had showed that the greenhouse gas emissions of vehicles running off electricity sourced from coal were worse than those of gasoline-powered vehicles. The new study confirmed those prior findings and also expanded them to encompass health impacts of various energy sources.

The researchers examined 10 different ways to power automobiles, including gasoline, diesel, liquid biofuels, compressed natural gas and electricity from a variety of sources, both conventional and alternative. They then calculated all the air pollution emitted from the process of producing the fuels (or batteries or electricity), as well as the pollution emitted during the vehicle’s operation. They then estimated the health and climate effects of these emissions.

Researcher Jason Hill emphasized that just looking at the emissions from a vehicle’s tailpipe can dramatically underestimate a fuel source’s health and environmental impact. For example, ethanol fuels are also responsible for air pollution released from the vehicles used to grow the corn, from the soil following the application of fertilizer, and from the process of fermenting and distilling the corn into ethanol.

When it come to electric vehicles, the source of the electricity is the key question. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, 39 percent of the country’s electricity comes from coal, 27 percent from natural gas, about 20 percent from nuclear power, 7 percent from dams or water turbines, and 6 percent from all other sources.

Coal, ethanol more lethal than gasoline

The researchers found that electric cars run from coal actually kill 360 percent more people than cars run from gasoline, due to increased soot and smog emissions. They also emit significantly more carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas.

In contrast, natural gas-powered electric cars would only kill half as many people as gasoline-powered cars. Electric cars powered from wind or water energy would cause only 25 percent as many air-pollution-related deaths. Hybrid and diesel engines were also lower-impact than gasoline engines.

Ethanol, in contrast, causes 80 percent more air pollution-related deaths than gasoline, and also emits more greenhouse gases.

“If we’re using ethanol for environmental benefits, for air quality and climate change, we’re going down the wrong path,” Hill said.

“Any honest accounting of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies must… consider the possibility of unintended consequences,” said Timothy Johnson of Duke University, who was not involved in the study.

Johnson noted that other impacts of different energy sources might include local environmental effects of producing or using the fuels, such as increased air pollution from truck traffic to ethanol refineries.

“While these considerations go beyond the paper’s focus on air quality, the study reminds us that we need to widen our analytical boundaries if we are going to address greenhouse gas emissions sustainably,” Johnson said.

Another impact might be destruction of water supplies due to mining for raw materials for solar panels, batteries or other alternative energy sources.

Monsanto’s New GM Wheat Will Increase Spraying of Three Toxic Herbicides

As reported on Natural News by David Gutierrez in October of 2014: “A field of unregulated genetically modified (GM) wheat has been discovered growing wild in Montana, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has announced. No varieties of GM wheat have been approved for cultivation in the United States, but this is the second plot discovered growing on its own in less than a year and a half.”

Do you think those two plots of genetically modified wheat are the only two out there? When wheat carries the traits of “herbicide resistance,” that means more and more herbicide will have to be sprayed as the weeds become resistant too. Agrochemical giant Monsanto is at it again, developing GM herbicide-resistant wheat. This time around, the wheat will be resistant to THREE different chemical herbicides: glyphosate, glufosinate and dicamba. Back in 2013, an Oregon farmer found Monsanto’s original “Roundup Ready” wheat growing in his fields. Monsanto had claimed to stop developing that line altogether about 10 years ago, but they obviously lied. It’s like the Cold War with these corporations — they agree not to do something and then they go double down and work harder on it. Monsanto had actually RESTARTED extensive field trials in 2011. Of course, the USDA called it an isolated incident and just couldn’t figure out how it could have happened in an Oregon field. Sure.

“Whole grains” aren’t so “whole” when you’re eating genetically modified organisms

Every farmer in America who doesn’t pollute his/her crop with chemicals and who doesn’t buy seeds that contain chemicals (GMO) deserves a subsidy bonus check from their country and a “do it yourself” lab kit that allows them to test their fields and crops for GMO contamination. If the FDA and USDA weren’t so darned crooked and corrupt, we would be living this way. In 2012 alone, the US exported wheat at a value estimated over $18 billion. How much of that wheat was genetically modified and got through as otherwise?

Over 60 countries have bans on GM crops. After the Oregon GM wheat discovery, Japan and the entire EU enacted serious barriers and restrictions on their import of wheat. Farmers immediately launched lawsuits against Monsanto, but Monsanto has previous “members” serving as high as Supreme Court Justices, so that could end ugly, but Monsanto still settled in the millions, most likely to keep the whole topic hush hush so the American masses won’t panic and stop buying all that INFLAMMATORY WHEAT.

You can’t wash off GMO

Roundup Ready farming is failing. That is why Monsanto is making new herbicide-tolerance GM crops — to fight back against the superweeds and superbugs these chemicals themselves created. But Mother Nature is evolving faster, just as it is with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The new GMO will be more of the same nightmare, but even more superweeds and superbugs to overcome, that are smarter and stronger anything mankind can “concoct” in a laboratory.

Start questioning everything that’s not certified organic.

Cheney, Rothschild, and Fox News’ Murdoch to Drill for Oil in Syria, Violating International Law

syrian-war-oilBy Justin Gardner

While Syria is torn apart by the warring of U.S. imperialists and Islamic fundamentalists—leaving its children to die of starvation—another country plans to take advantage of the chaos by stealing resources from Syria’s southern region. The theft will be carried out by the most notorious pushers of military hegemony, and they don’t care that it violates international law.

Genie Energy is an American-based oil and gas company with major investors and advisors comprising a who’s who list of war profiteers—Dick Cheney, Rupert Murdoch, Lord Jacob Rothschild, and James Woolsey. The president of their Israeli subsidiary is Efraim “Effi” Eitam, an Israeli military commander who called for expelling the “cancer” of Arabs from Israel.

Together, these warmongers and would-be ethnic cleansers will soon be drilling into a vast oil and gas reserve located in the Syrian territory occupied by Israel since 1967, known as Golan Heights. The move would be in clear violation of international law, specifically the Annex to the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Israeli authorities granted Genie Energy’s subsidiary, Afek Oil and Gas, exclusive petroleum exploration rights in a 153-square-mile region in Golan Heights. In 2015, above-ground geophysical tests discovered the presence of oil and natural gas reserves that could make Israel energy self-sufficient. Afek has already drilled three exploratory wells.

Israel has benefited from its illegal occupation of Syria’s Golan Heights for decades, drawing one-third of its entire water supply from the region and providing a tourist and skiing destination at the Mount Hermon Ski Resort. Despite persistent international pressure, including from the U.S., the occupation continues and will reach a new level with the extraction of fossil fuels.

Rupert Murdoch heralded his involvement in Genie Energy by touting the prosperity and freedom it will bring to the world.

“Covering and distributing news has been my life’s work,” said Mr. Murdoch. “If Genie’s effort to develop shale oil is successful, as I believe it will be, then the news we’ll report in the coming decades will reflect a more prosperous, more democratic, and more secure world.”

Of course, the war-stricken, starving, desperate people of Syria will never see a shred of that prosperity and security. Murdoch’s Fox “news” channel has been instrumental in pushing war in the Middle East and obfuscating the role played by the U.S. in fomenting the Syrian war, and soon he and his cronies will be reaping the profits.

While they make plans to steal energy resources from illegally occupied Syria, Genie Energy engages in publicity stunts to preempt the criticism that will undoubtedly follow. Last Christmas they donated coats and toys to needy families in Newark, New Jersey.

Drilling in Golan Heights is also drawing concerns about its impact to drinking water supplies. Since the reserves are locked up as shale oil, hydraulic fracturing (fracking) would likely be used to extract the fossil fuels. The shale oil is in close proximity to a large aquifer which supplies drinking water to the region; the fracking chemicals and polluted water spilled onto the ground could contaminate this water supply. A temporary restraining order was issued by the Israeli High Court in 2014, but did not last long as moneyed interests won out.

Momentum for the illegal oil drilling of Syrian territory by Murdoch, Cheney and the gang is aided by the assumption that Golan Heights is already part of Israel. Afek Oil and Gas refers to their newfound field simply as “northern Israel.” A prominent Israeli politician, Naftali Bennett, in 2015, called for the world to recognize Golan Heights as Israeli territory, while calling for the expansion of Jewish settlers in the region.

“I want to challenge the entire world,” said Bennett at the 15th annual Herzliya Conference of the Institute for Policy and Strategy. “I want to give the international community an opportunity to demonstrate their ethics. Recognize Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.”

Dick Cheney, Rupert Murdoch, Jacob Rothschild, and their henchmen have a long tradition of promoting war in the Middle East and exploiting its oil resources. The cabal formed under Genie Energy, led by the unapologetic Arab hater Effie Eitam, appears to have nothing standing in the way of their next conquest in Syria’s Golan Heights.

http://www.activistpost.com/2016/01/cheney-rothschild-and-fox-news-murdoch-to-drill-for-oil-in-syria-violating-international-law.html?

 

The Financial Crisis Of 2016 Rolls On – China, Oil, Copper And Junk Bonds All Continue To Crash

crisisBy Michael Snyder

Never before have we seen a year start like this.  On Monday, Chinese stocks crashed once again.  The Shanghai Composite Index plummeted another 5.29 percent, and this comes on the heels of two historic single day crashes last week.  All of this chaos over in China is one of the factors that continues to push commodity prices even lower.  Today the price of copper fell another 2.40 percent to $1.97, and the price of oil continued to implode.  At one point the price of U.S. oil plunged all the way down to $30.99 a barrel before rebounding just a little bit.  As I write this article, oil is down a total of 6.12 percent for the day and is currently sitting at $31.13.  U.S. stocks were mixed on Monday, but it is important to note that the Russell 2000 did officially enter bear market territory.  This is yet another confirmation of what I was talking about yesterday.  And junk bonds continue to plummet.  As I write this, JNK is down to 33.42.  All of these numbers are huge red flags that are screaming that big trouble is ahead.  Unfortunately, the mainstream media continues to insist that there is absolutely nothing to be concerned about.

Reads entire article: http://www.activistpost.com/2016/01/the-financial-crisis-of-2016-rolls-on-china-oil-copper-and-junk-bonds-all-continue-to-crash.html?

Are You Aware of Big Pharma’s Impressive Records?

skull fdaBy Catherine J. Frompovich

Everyone probably is familiar with the world population growth clock. Likewise, there’s the time-bomb-like clockwork for the United States national debt. But has anyone ever imagined what a clock would be like that ticks off Big Pharma’s impressive records?

Such a clock would not tick off Big Pharma’s earnings or profits, though. Much to everyone’s probable utter shock, a ‘clock’ has been developed and posted online titled “Pharma Death Clock”, which lists “Total deaths in the United States since January 1, 2000…Big Pharma’s chemical warfare on humanity dwarfs the number of victims killed by all world wars and acts of terrorism combined… While drug companies profit billions, people are dying by the millions.”

How much reality has to sink into human consciousness about the actuality of Big Pharma’s “medico-economics” harms—all done in the name of allopathic medicine championed by its super-duper trade unions like the American Medical Association? And, don’t forget their trade journals, too!

Consider just a few of the stunning (‘collateral damage?’) numbers—only from January 1, 2000, which obviously continue to accumulate on a daily basis:

table1However, what are not included are all the HRSA vaccine damage claims that have been paid by Vaccine Court Masters to vaccine-damaged vaccinees or their parents in the case of deaths. Let’s include that data set to see how that impacts Big Pharma’s ticking-time bomb, which the U.S. Congress and healthcare consumers ought to be waking up to very soon. How really sick do we have to be made by Big Pharma products?

Are you ready for the data and also the fact that Big Pharma is NOT liable for vaccine damages caused?

This represents cumulative payouts for fiscal years 1989 to 2015 for the following categories:[1]

table2A grand total of vaccine-damage-related expenses of close to 3.2 BILLION DOLLARS! That kind of ‘hush money’ doesn’t sound like vaccines are very safe, I offer.

So, let’s step back and ask this logical question:

“How much is Big Pharma and its toxic chemical products, aka pharmaceuticals and vaccines, really costing U.S. health consumers in hard earned dollars spent and/or lost because of problems related to pharmaceuticals?”

Any other business would be using its product liability insurance to take care of defective product damage claims. Where was Congress’s mind in 1986? Probably in Big Pharma’s back pocket?

How about a few other questions?

“Why is the ineffective U.S. Congress so lax to exercise its oversight powers over the pharmaceutical industry and the federal agencies Big Pharma seems to be manipulating, especially the FDA?”

“What roles do Big Pharma’s lobbyists’ deep pockets and campaign donations play in Congress looking the other way?”

“Why is Congress not investigating the fraud and misconduct within the FDA?”

See this article that says, “The FDA buries evidence of fraud in medical trials. [….] The silence is unbroken even when the FDA itself seems shocked at the degree of fraud and misconduct.”

“When will U.S. health consumers wake up to the reality of Big Pharma’s control over our health, bodies and lives?” And, take back that control.

“When will we put down our collective foot and demand not being ripped off by pharmaceutical price-gouging, forced mandatory vaccines, and pummeled by ineffective fraudulent consensus-tobacco-science masquerading as the only ‘legitimate’, insurance- reimbursed medical science and treatments?”

The clock is ticking!

http://www.activistpost.com/2016/01/are-you-aware-of-big-pharmas-impressive-records.html?

Last Week in Gun Control Psyops … More Fear

obama_gunsBy Melissa Dykes

Ask yourself this: how much of what you see in “the news” in a given day is real?

Last week was an insane welcome to President Obama’s new gun control executive actions. To put it in perspective, let’s take a look at the week’s events which helped transition it.

The Week Before

On December 31st, outgoing Education Secretary Arne Duncan gave his last speech at St. Sabina’s in Chicago. He tearfully spoke of guns killing children throughout his tenure. In fact, the majority of his speech was about gun violence, not education. In his talk, he mirrored Obama’s frustration at the lack of meaningful gun control measures and reaffirmed that Obama has vowed to do everything he can in his remaining year as president to further this effort. Just as Obama has repeatedly done, Duncan praised Australia’s strict gun control policies, which many have called out as coming after the nation suffered a gun control false flag, as a “gift” to its nation’s youth.

Monday, Jan. 4th

It was all over the news that Obama would be announcing his newest attack on the 2nd Amendment. The White House released a fact sheet on the new executive actions. Among these are:

  • a commitment to advancing “smart technology” including fingerprint scanners, RFID, and microstamping (research for which will be provided by the Dept. of Defense);
  • a $500 million investment in increased access to mental health care;
  • removal of HIPAA barriers to allow the Department of Health and Human Services to report “relevant information” about people who might be prohibited from owning a gun for mental health reasons;
  • and requiring a license for people engaged in the business of dealing firearms, which the White House says could mean as little as one or two transactions if other factors are present.

Tuesday, Jan. 5th

Obama gives a tearful press conference on his orders, tears which quickly become top headline everywhere. Most mainstream outlets start with lines like:

President Barack Obama paused to wipe away tears as he discussed the victims of 2012 Newtown shooting during a Tuesday morning press conference on his new executive actions aimed at curbing gun violence.

Just after he tears up and before everyone breaks into applause, Obama says, “and, by the way, it happens on the streets of Chicago every day.”

Ironically, 12 people were shot and killed in Chicago that same day, a city that has some of the nation’s strictest gun laws.

The same day, Hillary Clinton, who has also referenced Australia’s gun control in speeches and has said she will pass her own gun control executive orders if she becomes president, praised Obama, saying “I’m very proud of what the President called for this morning with his executive order. I was pleased because some of what he’d called for, I’d advocated for a couple months ago in the debates and in the campaign.”

Wednesday, Jan. 6th

The one-year anniversary of the Charlie Hebdo attacks. A man walks into a Paris police department wearing a fake suicide belt, wielding a meat clever, and yelling “Allahu Akbar”. He is promptly shot by cops.  Charlie Hebdo dominates headlines for the first time in a year.

An advisory panel at Umpqua Community College announces the building where a mass shooting of nine people happened back in October will be torn down and rebuilt completely. Employees return to work at at the site of the reported San Bernardino shooting, and the friend charged with buying a gun in the case pleads not guilty. Both shootings are refreshed all over the news for the public, along with the announcement that James Tracy, a prominent proponent of the Sandy Hook shooting hoax theory, has fired from his tenured position at Florida Atlantic University.

Via The New York Times:

Mr. Tracy has said the Newtown massacre may have been carried out by “crisis actors” employed by the Obama administration. Mr. Tracy’s ideas fall into part of a larger movement of Internet conspiracy theorists who believe the spate of mass murders have simply been staged by the government. A few of the theorists do not think the shootings took place at all.

So, along with the San Bernardino and Oregon mass shootings refreshed in the public’s minds, Sandy Hook is also back in the news…

Never mind the fact that none of the executive orders Obama just passed would have stopped any of these mass shootings, (which all took place in gun free zones by the way), from happening.

Read entire article & view videos here: http://www.activistpost.com/2016/01/last-week-in-gun-control-psyops-more-fear.html?

 

A SINGLE DOSE of Antibiotics Can Cause Long-term Gut Damage

The statistics are sobering: in the United States alone, antibiotic-resistant bacteria cause 23,000 fatalities and at least 2 million new cases of disease annually. But if you think antibiotic resistance only comes about with massive and repeated rounds of antibiotics, think again.

Science shows that just one dose of antibiotic ‘therapy’ not only contributes to antibiotic resistance, but also brings about long-term damage to the microbes living in the gut. Many of the intestinal bacteria destroyed by antibiotics play a significant role in the body’s natural defense system against cancer and other disease conditions.

Take control of your health, naturally, with INSTANT access to over 300 programs focused on natural solutions for disease from the best integrative healthcare providers, oncologists and naturopaths in the world.

Just one dose: Science reveals the true danger of antibiotics inside the gut

European researchers recently reported study results showing even a single course of antibiotics is capable of disrupting the healthy population of microorganisms in the gut. Just as disturbing, the results can last up to a year and contribute to antibiotic resistance.

In their study, 66 healthy adults from the United Kingdom and Sweden were randomly assigned to receive a full course of one of four antibiotics – ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, amoxicillin or minocycline – or a placebo. The researchers did not know which antibiotic any given participant took throughout the course of the study.

Fecal and saliva samples were collected from the subjects at the start of the study, then again immediately after beginning the study drugs. Additional samples were taken at one, two, four and 12-month intervals after finishing a single course of antibiotics.

Results showed the drugs caused a notable increase in genes associated with antibiotic resistance, while seriously impacting the diversity of microbes in the gut and causing changes still evident months after initial exposure.

Eliminate the need for antibiotics and discover how to REVERSE disease symptoms naturally from over 200 integrative medical doctors, naturopaths and cancer specialists teaching you detoxification techniques, immune boosting strategies plus anti-aging protocols.

All antibiotics are NOT created equal and the results can be devastating

Researchers have reported differences among the various antibiotics utilized in the study. Specifically, the health-related bacteria in the gut were significantly reduced for up to four months in participants taking clindamycin and up to 12 months in those taking ciprofloxacin. Amoxicillin showed a less dramatic shift in microbial populations, but was the largest contributor to increased antibiotic resistance.

Researchers noted that participants from the UK came into the study with more antibiotic resistance than did the subjects from Sweden. This could be due to cultural differences and the significant decline in antibiotic use in Sweden over the past 15 or 20 years.

Lead author Egija Zaura, PhD, an associate professor in oral microbial ecology at the Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, wrote that microorganisms in study participants’ feces were severely affected by most of the antibiotics, with changes lasting for months. More specifically, researchers reported a decrease in the number of desirable microbes that produce butyrate, which inhibits inflammation, combats cancer and reduces stress in the gut.

Lifesaving question: How do antibiotics increase the risk of disease?

While antibiotic resistance may be at the center of the research results, the affects on microbial populations in the gut have other far-reaching impacts. Earlier research has shown that antibiotics can alter critical gut microbiota that affect the body’s vulnerability to contracting a number of infectious diseases.

These differences in intestinal flora may have a far-reaching impact on overall health and wellbeing. For example, did you know that changes in the gut’s microbe population can leave the body vulnerable to infection, vitamin and mineral deficiencies, obesity, inflammation of the gut, malabsorption and food allergies?